PDCAT 2005 --- REVIEW FORM (page 1)
===================================

This page will be forwarded to the author(s).

Paper Number:

Paper Title: 

Author(s): 
_____________________________________________________________________________

Please rate the paper, placing a number for each item.
(5: Excellent;  4: Very Good;  3: Good;  2: Fair;  1: Poor)

Originality (novelty, degree of innovation):_______

Significance (importance, applicability):_______

Technical quality (correctness, completeness):_______

Presentation (clarity, understandability):_______
____________________________________________________________________________

Recommended action for paper: ______
 (6: Strong Accept;   5: Accept;        4: Weak Accept;
  3: Neutral;         2: Weak Reject;   1: Reject)

If accepted, should it be accepted as a long or short paper? ______

Referee's confidence in the above evaluation: ______
1 (low confidence) to 5 (high confidence)
____________________________________________________________________________

Specific Comments to Author(s):


 
 
 
 



PDCAT 2005  REVIEW FORM (Page 2)
================================

This page will NOT be given to the author(s).

____________________________________________________________________________

INFORMATION FOR REFEREES

Please complete the review form and send it to your area-responsible 
Chair via email ONLY. We need to ask that this form 
be returned by July 10 2005 in order to have proceedings 
available at the conference.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name of Program Committee Member/Reviewer:


E-mail Address and Affiliation of Reviewer (if not PC member):


____________________________________________________________________________

Comments to the area-responsible Chair, to be withheld from the author(s):