YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  minus(x,|0|()) -> x
  minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
  app(nil(),y) -> y
  app(add(n,x),y) -> add(n,app(x,y))
  reverse(nil()) -> nil()
  reverse(add(n,x)) -> app(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
  shuffle(nil()) -> nil()
  shuffle(add(n,x)) -> add(n,shuffle(reverse(x)))
  concat(leaf(),y) -> y
  concat(cons(u,v),y) -> cons(u,concat(v,y))
  less_leaves(x,leaf()) -> false()
  less_leaves(leaf(),cons(w,z)) -> true()
  less_leaves(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p2: quot#(s(x),s(y)) -> quot#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p3: quot#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p4: app#(add(n,x),y) -> app#(x,y)
p5: reverse#(add(n,x)) -> app#(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
p6: reverse#(add(n,x)) -> reverse#(x)
p7: shuffle#(add(n,x)) -> shuffle#(reverse(x))
p8: shuffle#(add(n,x)) -> reverse#(x)
p9: concat#(cons(u,v),y) -> concat#(v,y)
p10: less_leaves#(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves#(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))
p11: less_leaves#(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> concat#(u,v)
p12: less_leaves#(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> concat#(w,z)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: app(nil(),y) -> y
r6: app(add(n,x),y) -> add(n,app(x,y))
r7: reverse(nil()) -> nil()
r8: reverse(add(n,x)) -> app(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
r9: shuffle(nil()) -> nil()
r10: shuffle(add(n,x)) -> add(n,shuffle(reverse(x)))
r11: concat(leaf(),y) -> y
r12: concat(cons(u,v),y) -> cons(u,concat(v,y))
r13: less_leaves(x,leaf()) -> false()
r14: less_leaves(leaf(),cons(w,z)) -> true()
r15: less_leaves(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}
  {p1}
  {p7}
  {p6}
  {p4}
  {p10}
  {p9}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: quot#(s(x),s(y)) -> quot#(minus(x,y),s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: app(nil(),y) -> y
r6: app(add(n,x),y) -> add(n,app(x,y))
r7: reverse(nil()) -> nil()
r8: reverse(add(n,x)) -> app(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
r9: shuffle(nil()) -> nil()
r10: shuffle(add(n,x)) -> add(n,shuffle(reverse(x)))
r11: concat(leaf(),y) -> y
r12: concat(cons(u,v),y) -> cons(u,concat(v,y))
r13: less_leaves(x,leaf()) -> false()
r14: less_leaves(leaf(),cons(w,z)) -> true()
r15: less_leaves(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          quot#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          minus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
          |0|_A() = 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          quot#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 16, x2 - 25}
          s_A(x1) = max{23, x1 + 12}
          minus_A(x1,x2) = max{15, x1 + 12, x2 + 3}
          |0|_A = 27
          quot#!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 31, x2 - 43}
          s!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 2}
          minus!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 20, x2 - 32}
          |0|!_A = 0
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(quot#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(minus) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: app(nil(),y) -> y
r6: app(add(n,x),y) -> add(n,app(x,y))
r7: reverse(nil()) -> nil()
r8: reverse(add(n,x)) -> app(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
r9: shuffle(nil()) -> nil()
r10: shuffle(add(n,x)) -> add(n,shuffle(reverse(x)))
r11: concat(leaf(),y) -> y
r12: concat(cons(u,v),y) -> cons(u,concat(v,y))
r13: less_leaves(x,leaf()) -> false()
r14: less_leaves(leaf(),cons(w,z)) -> true()
r15: less_leaves(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          minus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          minus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
          s_A(x1) = max{12, x1 + 9}
          minus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 13, x2 - 13}
          s!_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 10}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: shuffle#(add(n,x)) -> shuffle#(reverse(x))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: app(nil(),y) -> y
r6: app(add(n,x),y) -> add(n,app(x,y))
r7: reverse(nil()) -> nil()
r8: reverse(add(n,x)) -> app(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
r9: shuffle(nil()) -> nil()
r10: shuffle(add(n,x)) -> add(n,shuffle(reverse(x)))
r11: concat(leaf(),y) -> y
r12: concat(cons(u,v),y) -> cons(u,concat(v,y))
r13: less_leaves(x,leaf()) -> false()
r14: less_leaves(leaf(),cons(w,z)) -> true()
r15: less_leaves(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r5, r6, r7, r8, r9

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          shuffle#_A(x1) = x1
          add_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
          reverse_A(x1) = x1 + 1
          app_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
          nil_A() = 0
          shuffle_A(x1) = 2
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          shuffle#_A(x1) = max{12, x1 - 2}
          add_A(x1,x2) = 5
          reverse_A(x1) = 14
          app_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 1, x2 + 4}
          nil_A = 8
          shuffle_A(x1) = 8
          shuffle#!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 2}
          add!_A(x1,x2) = 0
          reverse!_A(x1) = 0
          app!_A(x1,x2) = 0
          nil!_A = 0
          shuffle!_A(x1) = 0
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(shuffle#) = []
      pi(add) = []
      pi(reverse) = [1]
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(nil) = []
      pi(shuffle) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: reverse#(add(n,x)) -> reverse#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: app(nil(),y) -> y
r6: app(add(n,x),y) -> add(n,app(x,y))
r7: reverse(nil()) -> nil()
r8: reverse(add(n,x)) -> app(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
r9: shuffle(nil()) -> nil()
r10: shuffle(add(n,x)) -> add(n,shuffle(reverse(x)))
r11: concat(leaf(),y) -> y
r12: concat(cons(u,v),y) -> cons(u,concat(v,y))
r13: less_leaves(x,leaf()) -> false()
r14: less_leaves(leaf(),cons(w,z)) -> true()
r15: less_leaves(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          reverse#_A(x1) = x1
          add_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          reverse#_A(x1) = 0
          add_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 2, x2 - 2}
          reverse#!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 14}
          add!_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 7, x2 - 14}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(reverse#) = []
      pi(add) = [2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(add(n,x),y) -> app#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: app(nil(),y) -> y
r6: app(add(n,x),y) -> add(n,app(x,y))
r7: reverse(nil()) -> nil()
r8: reverse(add(n,x)) -> app(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
r9: shuffle(nil()) -> nil()
r10: shuffle(add(n,x)) -> add(n,shuffle(reverse(x)))
r11: concat(leaf(),y) -> y
r12: concat(cons(u,v),y) -> cons(u,concat(v,y))
r13: less_leaves(x,leaf()) -> false()
r14: less_leaves(leaf(),cons(w,z)) -> true()
r15: less_leaves(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          app#_A(x1,x2) = x1
          add_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 5
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          app#_A(x1,x2) = 0
          add_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 7, x2 - 5}
          app#!_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 25, x2 - 1}
          add!_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 46, x2 - 26}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(app#) = []
      pi(add) = [2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: less_leaves#(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves#(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: app(nil(),y) -> y
r6: app(add(n,x),y) -> add(n,app(x,y))
r7: reverse(nil()) -> nil()
r8: reverse(add(n,x)) -> app(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
r9: shuffle(nil()) -> nil()
r10: shuffle(add(n,x)) -> add(n,shuffle(reverse(x)))
r11: concat(leaf(),y) -> y
r12: concat(cons(u,v),y) -> cons(u,concat(v,y))
r13: less_leaves(x,leaf()) -> false()
r14: less_leaves(leaf(),cons(w,z)) -> true()
r15: less_leaves(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r11, r12

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          less_leaves#_A(x1,x2) = x2
          cons_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
          concat_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
          leaf_A() = 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          less_leaves#_A(x1,x2) = 0
          cons_A(x1,x2) = 5
          concat_A(x1,x2) = max{17, x1 - 8, x2 + 16}
          leaf_A = 6
          less_leaves#!_A(x1,x2) = 0
          cons!_A(x1,x2) = 0
          concat!_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 7, x2 - 1}
          leaf!_A = 3
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(less_leaves#) = []
      pi(cons) = [1]
      pi(concat) = [1, 2]
      pi(leaf) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: concat#(cons(u,v),y) -> concat#(v,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: app(nil(),y) -> y
r6: app(add(n,x),y) -> add(n,app(x,y))
r7: reverse(nil()) -> nil()
r8: reverse(add(n,x)) -> app(reverse(x),add(n,nil()))
r9: shuffle(nil()) -> nil()
r10: shuffle(add(n,x)) -> add(n,shuffle(reverse(x)))
r11: concat(leaf(),y) -> y
r12: concat(cons(u,v),y) -> cons(u,concat(v,y))
r13: less_leaves(x,leaf()) -> false()
r14: less_leaves(leaf(),cons(w,z)) -> true()
r15: less_leaves(cons(u,v),cons(w,z)) -> less_leaves(concat(u,v),concat(w,z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          concat#_A(x1,x2) = x1
          cons_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          concat#_A(x1,x2) = 0
          cons_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 3, x2 - 3}
          concat#!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 1, x2 - 1}
          cons!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 9, x2 - 16}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(concat#) = []
      pi(cons) = [2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.