YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  p(|0|()) -> |0|()
  p(s(x)) -> x
  plus(x,|0|()) -> x
  plus(|0|(),y) -> y
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
  plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
  times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
  times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
  div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
  quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
  div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
  eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
  eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
  eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
  eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
  divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
  prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
  pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
  pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
  if(true(),x,y) -> false()
  if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)
p3: plus#(s(x),y) -> p#(s(x))
p4: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p5: plus#(x,s(y)) -> p#(s(y))
p6: times#(s(x),y) -> plus#(y,times(x,y))
p7: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)
p8: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p9: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p10: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p11: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(y,z))
p12: div#(div(x,y),z) -> times#(y,z)
p13: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)
p14: divides#(y,x) -> eq#(x,times(div(x,y),y))
p15: divides#(y,x) -> times#(div(x,y),y)
p16: divides#(y,x) -> div#(x,y)
p17: prime#(s(s(x))) -> pr#(s(s(x)),s(x))
p18: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
p19: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> divides#(s(s(y)),x)
p20: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p18, p20}
  {p8, p9, p10, p11}
  {p7}
  {p1, p2, p4}
  {p13}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)
p2: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r9, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3 + 1
          false_A() = 4
          pr#_A(x1,x2) = x2
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 7
          divides_A(x1,x2) = 1
          times_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
          |0|_A() = 1
          div_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{1, x2 - 1, x3 - 12}
          false_A = 3
          pr#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 1, x2 - 26}
          s_A(x1) = 13
          divides_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 14}
          times_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2}
          |0|_A = 7
          div_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2}
          if#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{18, x2 + 4}
          false!_A = 19
          pr#!_A(x1,x2) = max{17, x1 + 3, x2 - 10}
          s!_A(x1) = x1 + 4
          divides!_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x1 - 27, x2 - 14}
          times!_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x1 - 13, x2 - 2}
          |0|!_A = 5
          div!_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 11, x2 - 13}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(pr#) = [2]
      pi(s) = []
      pi(divides) = []
      pi(times) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(div) = [2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(y,z))
p2: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p4: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r8

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          div#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 3
          div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 6
          times_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 13
          quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + 3
          |0|_A() = 5
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          div#_A(x1,x2) = 1
          div_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 10, x2 - 27}
          times_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 27, x2 + 9}
          quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 1
          |0|_A = 9
          s_A(x1) = 32
          div#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 37
          div!_A(x1,x2) = max{60, x1 + 53, x2 - 33}
          times!_A(x1,x2) = max{61, x1 + 27, x2 - 1}
          quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + 37
          |0|!_A = 3
          s!_A(x1) = x1 + 38
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = [1]
      pi(div) = [1]
      pi(times) = [1]
      pi(quot#) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p4



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          div#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
          quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2 + 1
          |0|_A() = 5
          s_A(x1) = 2
          p_A(x1) = x1 + 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          div#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 2, x2 - 10}
          quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{0, x1 - 2, x2 - 13, x3 - 10}
          |0|_A = 11
          s_A(x1) = max{9, x1 - 60}
          p_A(x1) = max{151, x1 + 35}
          div#!_A(x1,x2) = max{74, x2 - 12}
          quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{74, x1 - 1, x2 - 12, x3 + 64}
          |0|!_A = 1
          s!_A(x1) = max{13, x1 + 4}
          p!_A(x1) = 83
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(quot#) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(p) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r8

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          times#_A(x1,x2) = x1
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
          times_A(x1,x2) = 6
          |0|_A() = 5
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          times#_A(x1,x2) = 0
          s_A(x1) = max{17, x1 - 30}
          times_A(x1,x2) = max{28, x1 - 20, x2 - 31}
          |0|_A = 3
          times#!_A(x1,x2) = 0
          s!_A(x1) = 5
          times!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 75, x2 - 122}
          |0|!_A = 22
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(times#) = [1]
      pi(s) = []
      pi(times) = []
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p3: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r8

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 6
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 5
          p_A(x1) = x1
          |0|_A() = 4
          times_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 13
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 20, x2 - 30}
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 32
          p_A(x1) = max{31, x1 - 20}
          |0|_A = 9
          times_A(x1,x2) = max{63, x1 - 34, x2 - 6}
          plus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 8
          s!_A(x1) = 7
          p!_A(x1) = 4
          |0|!_A = 4
          times!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 33, x2 + 7}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(p) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(times) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2, p3

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          eq#_A(x1,x2) = 7
          s_A(x1) = 6
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          eq#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 19, x2 - 19}
          s_A(x1) = max{56, x1 + 18}
          eq#!_A(x1,x2) = max{17, x1 - 19, x2 - 57}
          s!_A(x1) = max{16, x1 + 2}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(eq#) = []
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.