YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  plus(x,|0|()) -> x
  plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
  times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
  times(s(x),y) -> plus(times(x,y),y)
  p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))
  p(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
  fac(s(x)) -> times(fac(p(s(x))),s(x))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: times#(s(x),y) -> plus#(times(x,y),y)
p3: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)
p4: p#(s(s(x))) -> p#(s(x))
p5: fac#(s(x)) -> times#(fac(p(s(x))),s(x))
p6: fac#(s(x)) -> fac#(p(s(x)))
p7: fac#(s(x)) -> p#(s(x))

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
r3: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r4: times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(x),y) -> plus(times(x,y),y)
r6: p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))
r7: p(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r8: fac(s(x)) -> times(fac(p(s(x))),s(x))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p6}
  {p3}
  {p1}
  {p4}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: fac#(s(x)) -> fac#(p(s(x)))

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
r3: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r4: times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(x),y) -> plus(times(x,y),y)
r6: p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))
r7: p(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r8: fac(s(x)) -> times(fac(p(s(x))),s(x))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r6, r7

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        fac#_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 16}
        s_A(x1) = max{26, x1 + 18}
        p_A(x1) = max{11, x1 - 11}
        |0|_A = 42
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            fac#_A(x1) = x1
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
            p_A(x1) = x1
            |0|_A() = 3
            fac#!_A(x1) = 1
            s!_A(x1) = 0
            p!_A(x1) = 1
            |0|!_A() = 2
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(fac#) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(p) = []
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
r3: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r4: times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(x),y) -> plus(times(x,y),y)
r6: p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))
r7: p(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r8: fac(s(x)) -> times(fac(p(s(x))),s(x))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        times#_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 + 1, x2 + 1}
        s_A(x1) = max{3, x1}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            times#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = 4
            times#!_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s!_A(x1) = 3
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(times#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
r3: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r4: times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(x),y) -> plus(times(x,y),y)
r6: p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))
r7: p(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r8: fac(s(x)) -> times(fac(p(s(x))),s(x))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        plus#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 5
        s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = 4
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = 2
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 1
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [2]
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: p#(s(s(x))) -> p#(s(x))

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
r3: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r4: times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(x),y) -> plus(times(x,y),y)
r6: p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x)))
r7: p(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r8: fac(s(x)) -> times(fac(p(s(x))),s(x))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        p#_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 7}
        s_A(x1) = x1 + 5
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            p#_A(x1) = x1
            s_A(x1) = 4
            p#!_A(x1) = 0
            s!_A(x1) = 1
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(p#) = []
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.