YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  p(|0|()) -> |0|()
  p(s(x)) -> x
  plus(x,|0|()) -> x
  plus(|0|(),y) -> y
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
  plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
  times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
  times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
  div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
  quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
  quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
  div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
  eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
  eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
  eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
  eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
  divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
  prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
  pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
  pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
  if(true(),x,y) -> false()
  if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
  zero(div(x,x)) -> x
  zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
  zero(times(x,x)) -> x
  zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
  zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)
p3: plus#(s(x),y) -> p#(s(x))
p4: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p5: plus#(x,s(y)) -> p#(s(y))
p6: times#(s(x),y) -> plus#(y,times(x,y))
p7: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)
p8: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p9: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p10: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p11: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(zero(y),z))
p12: div#(div(x,y),z) -> times#(zero(y),z)
p13: div#(div(x,y),z) -> zero#(y)
p14: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)
p15: divides#(y,x) -> eq#(x,times(div(x,y),y))
p16: divides#(y,x) -> times#(div(x,y),y)
p17: divides#(y,x) -> div#(x,y)
p18: prime#(s(s(x))) -> pr#(s(s(x)),s(x))
p19: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
p20: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> divides#(s(s(y)),x)
p21: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)
p22: zero#(s(x)) -> if#(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))
p23: zero#(s(x)) -> eq#(x,s(|0|()))
p24: zero#(s(x)) -> plus#(zero(|0|()),|0|())
p25: zero#(s(x)) -> zero#(|0|())
p26: zero#(s(x)) -> plus#(|0|(),zero(|0|()))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p8, p9, p10, p11, p13, p17, p19, p20, p21, p22}
  {p7}
  {p1, p2, p4}
  {p14}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> divides#(s(s(y)),x)
p2: divides#(y,x) -> div#(x,y)
p3: div#(div(x,y),z) -> zero#(y)
p4: zero#(s(x)) -> if#(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))
p5: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)
p6: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
p7: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(zero(y),z))
p8: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p9: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p10: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r3, r4, r9, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        pr#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 18, x2 + 116}
        s_A(x1) = max{94, x1 + 12}
        divides#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 21, x2 + 14}
        div#_A(x1,x2) = max{20, x1 + 13}
        div_A(x1,x2) = max{206, x1, x2 + 188}
        zero#_A(x1) = max{212, x1 + 200}
        if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{213, x2 + 18, x3 + 117}
        eq_A(x1,x2) = max{295, x2 - 188}
        |0|_A = 150
        plus_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 14, x2 + 72}
        zero_A(x1) = max{28, x1 - 121}
        false_A = 1
        divides_A(x1,x2) = max{209, x1 + 207, x2 + 19}
        times_A(x1,x2) = max{208, x1 - 11, x2 + 188}
        quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{20, x1 + 13}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            pr#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 11
            divides#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            div#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
            zero#_A(x1) = 0
            if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 0
            eq_A(x1,x2) = 1
            |0|_A() = 12
            plus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
            zero_A(x1) = 1
            false_A() = 15
            divides_A(x1,x2) = 14
            times_A(x1,x2) = x2
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 0
            pr#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 19
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 4
            divides#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 40
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = 60
            div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 59
            zero#!_A(x1) = 59
            if#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 20
            eq!_A(x1,x2) = 59
            |0|!_A() = 19
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = x2
            zero!_A(x1) = 2
            false!_A() = 18
            divides!_A(x1,x2) = 42
            times!_A(x1,x2) = 41
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 60
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(pr#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(divides#) = []
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(div) = []
      pi(zero#) = []
      pi(if#) = []
      pi(eq) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(plus) = [1, 2]
      pi(zero) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(divides) = []
      pi(times) = []
      pi(quot#) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p10



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(zero(y),z))
p2: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(zero(y),z))
p2: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r9, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        div#_A(x1,x2) = 0
        div_A(x1,x2) = max{13, x1 + 3, x2 - 2}
        times_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 26, x2 + 1}
        zero_A(x1) = max{13, x1 - 22}
        quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 0
        |0|_A = 32
        s_A(x1) = x1 + 11
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            div#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 9
            times_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 10
            zero_A(x1) = 29
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 0
            |0|_A() = 16
            s_A(x1) = 11
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 24
            div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 23
            times!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 5
            zero!_A(x1) = 17
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + 24
            |0|!_A() = 20
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 1
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(div) = [1]
      pi(times) = []
      pi(zero) = []
      pi(quot#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r5, r6, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        div#_A(x1,x2) = 13
        quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 13
        |0|_A = 43
        s_A(x1) = 13
        plus_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 31, x2 + 76}
        p_A(x1) = max{43, x1 + 30}
        div_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 7, x2 - 45}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            div#_A(x1,x2) = x2
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3
            |0|_A() = 5
            s_A(x1) = 3
            plus_A(x1,x2) = x1
            p_A(x1) = 0
            div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 1
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2
            |0|!_A() = 15
            s!_A(x1) = 6
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = 5
            p!_A(x1) = x1 + 11
            div!_A(x1,x2) = 8
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(quot#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(plus) = []
      pi(p) = [1]
      pi(div) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        times#_A(x1,x2) = max{71, x2 - 1}
        s_A(x1) = max{70, x1 + 14}
        div_A(x1,x2) = max{9, x1 - 2, x2 + 1}
        |0|_A = 5
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            times#_A(x1,x2) = x1
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
            div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
            |0|_A() = 7
            times#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 13
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 12
            div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 19
            |0|!_A() = 14
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(times#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(div) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p3: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r9, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        plus#_A(x1,x2) = 172
        s_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 25}
        p_A(x1) = max{171, x1 + 98}
        |0|_A = 35
        times_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 2, x2 + 37}
        div_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 36
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
            p_A(x1) = x1
            |0|_A() = 3
            times_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
            div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 4
            s!_A(x1) = 5
            p!_A(x1) = 7
            |0|!_A() = 3
            times!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 2
            div!_A(x1,x2) = 6
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(p) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(times) = []
      pi(div) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p2: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p2: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r2, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{29, x2 + 1}
        s_A(x1) = x1 + 39
        p_A(x1) = max{37, x1 - 3}
        div_A(x1,x2) = x1
        |0|_A = 100
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 6
            p_A(x1) = x1
            div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 20
            |0|_A() = 32
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = 28
            s!_A(x1) = 30
            p!_A(x1) = 29
            div!_A(x1,x2) = 20
            |0|!_A() = 31
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(p) = []
      pi(div) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r2

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{19, x1 + 2}
        s_A(x1) = max{30, x1 + 18}
        p_A(x1) = max{27, x1 - 9}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 6
            p_A(x1) = x1
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = 15
            s!_A(x1) = 16
            p!_A(x1) = 11
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [1]
      pi(s) = []
      pi(p) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(zero(y),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(zero(y),z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)
r27: zero(div(x,x)) -> x
r28: zero(divides(x,x)) -> x
r29: zero(times(x,x)) -> x
r30: zero(quot(x,x,x)) -> x
r31: zero(s(x)) -> if(eq(x,s(|0|())),plus(zero(|0|()),|0|()),s(plus(|0|(),zero(|0|()))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r9, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        eq#_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x2 - 23}
        s_A(x1) = x1 + 22
        times_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 65, x2 + 79}
        |0|_A = 9
        div_A(x1,x2) = max{111, x2 + 18}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            eq#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
            times_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 1
            |0|_A() = 3
            div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
            eq#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 5
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 5
            times!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 9
            |0|!_A() = 9
            div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 8
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(eq#) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(times) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(div) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.