YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  minus(x,|0|()) -> x
  minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
  minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
  plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
  plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
  plus(zero(),y) -> y
  plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
  id(x) -> x
  if(true(),x,y) -> x
  if(false(),x,y) -> y
  not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
  gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
  gt(zero(),y) -> false()
  gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p2: quot#(s(x),s(y)) -> quot#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p3: quot#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p4: minus#(minus(x,y),z) -> minus#(x,plus(y,z))
p5: minus#(minus(x,y),z) -> plus#(y,z)
p6: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p7: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> if#(gt(x,y),x,y)
p8: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> gt#(x,y)
p9: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))
p10: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> not#(gt(x,y))
p11: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> id#(x)
p12: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> id#(y)
p13: plus#(s(x),x) -> plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
p14: plus#(s(x),x) -> if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x))
p15: plus#(s(x),x) -> gt#(x,x)
p16: plus#(s(x),x) -> id#(x)
p17: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> plus#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))
p18: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> if#(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))
p19: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> gt#(s(y),y)
p20: not#(x) -> if#(x,false(),true())
p21: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> gt#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r6: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r7: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r8: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r9: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r10: id(x) -> x
r11: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r12: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r13: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r14: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r15: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r16: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}
  {p1, p4}
  {p6, p13, p17}
  {p21}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: quot#(s(x),s(y)) -> quot#(minus(x,y),s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r6: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r7: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r8: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r9: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r10: id(x) -> x
r11: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r12: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r13: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r14: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r15: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r16: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r5

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        quot#_A(x1,x2) = max{46, x1 + 10, x2 + 34}
        s_A(x1) = x1 + 12
        minus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 10
        |0|_A = 11
        plus_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 36}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            quot#_A(x1,x2) = x1
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
            minus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
            |0|_A() = 1
            plus_A(x1,x2) = 1
            quot#!_A(x1,x2) = x2
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 9
            minus!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 5
            |0|!_A() = 8
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = 7
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(quot#) = [1]
      pi(s) = []
      pi(minus) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(plus) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p2: minus#(minus(x,y),z) -> minus#(x,plus(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r6: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r7: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r8: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r9: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r10: id(x) -> x
r11: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r12: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r13: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r14: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r15: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r16: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r10, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        minus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 4
        s_A(x1) = max{21, x1 + 5}
        minus_A(x1,x2) = max{25, x1 + 4, x2 - 2}
        plus_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 83
        id_A(x1) = x1 + 55
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{139, x1 - 2, x2 + 88, x3 - 55}
        true_A = 55
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            minus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = 5
            minus_A(x1,x2) = 6
            plus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
            id_A(x1) = x1 + 3
            if_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + 6
            true_A() = 3
            minus#!_A(x1,x2) = 2
            s!_A(x1) = 2
            minus!_A(x1,x2) = 3
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 4
            id!_A(x1) = 5
            if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 5
            true!_A() = 3
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(minus) = []
      pi(plus) = [2]
      pi(id) = [1]
      pi(if) = []
      pi(true) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p2: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> plus#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))
p3: plus#(s(x),x) -> plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r6: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r7: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r8: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r9: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r10: id(x) -> x
r11: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r12: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r13: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r14: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r15: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r16: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 31, x2 + 22}
        s_A(x1) = x1 + 100
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{68, x1 - 14, x2 + 38, x3}
        gt_A(x1,x2) = max{60, x1 - 34, x2 - 100}
        not_A(x1) = max{123, x1 - 13}
        id_A(x1) = x1 + 28
        true_A = 61
        false_A = 59
        zero_A = 62
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = 2
            if_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 3
            gt_A(x1,x2) = 1
            not_A(x1) = 5
            id_A(x1) = x1 + 6
            true_A() = 1
            false_A() = 1
            zero_A() = 1
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = 4
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 5
            if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 8
            gt!_A(x1,x2) = 2
            not!_A(x1) = 5
            id!_A(x1) = 4
            true!_A() = 0
            false!_A() = 0
            zero!_A() = 1
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(if) = [2, 3]
      pi(gt) = []
      pi(not) = []
      pi(id) = [1]
      pi(true) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(zero) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p3



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p2: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> plus#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r6: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r7: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r8: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r9: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r10: id(x) -> x
r11: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r12: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r13: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r14: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r15: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r16: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p2: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> plus#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r6: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r7: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r8: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r9: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r10: id(x) -> x
r11: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r12: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r13: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r14: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r15: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r16: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r10, r11, r12

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{58, x1 + 37, x2 + 13}
        s_A(x1) = max{109, x1 + 46}
        if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{20, x2 + 10, x3}
        gt_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 49, x2 - 150}
        not_A(x1) = x1 + 146
        id_A(x1) = x1 + 35
        true_A = 47
        false_A = 3
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = 3
            if_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 2
            gt_A(x1,x2) = 1
            not_A(x1) = 1
            id_A(x1) = x1 + 1
            true_A() = 2
            false_A() = 2
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 9
            s!_A(x1) = 2
            if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 4
            gt!_A(x1,x2) = 6
            not!_A(x1) = 1
            id!_A(x1) = x1 + 8
            true!_A() = 0
            false!_A() = 0
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(if) = [2, 3]
      pi(gt) = []
      pi(not) = []
      pi(id) = [1]
      pi(true) = []
      pi(false) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> gt#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r6: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r7: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r8: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r9: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r10: id(x) -> x
r11: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r12: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r13: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r14: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r15: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r16: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r8

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        gt#_A(x1,x2) = 1
        s_A(x1) = 0
        plus_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 2, x2 + 10}
        zero_A = 5
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
        
          carrier: N^1
          order: standard order
          interpretations:
            gt#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 3
            plus_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 1
            zero_A() = 1
            gt#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
            s!_A(x1) = 4
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 5
            zero!_A() = 1
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(gt#) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(plus) = [2]
      pi(zero) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.