YES We show the termination of the TRS R: cond(true(),x) -> cond(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) and(x,false()) -> false() and(false(),x) -> false() and(true(),true()) -> true() even(|0|()) -> true() even(s(|0|())) -> false() even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) gr(|0|(),x) -> false() gr(s(x),|0|()) -> true() gr(s(x),s(y())) -> gr(x,y()) p(|0|()) -> |0|() p(s(x)) -> x -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: cond#(true(),x) -> cond#(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) p2: cond#(true(),x) -> and#(even(x),gr(x,|0|())) p3: cond#(true(),x) -> even#(x) p4: cond#(true(),x) -> gr#(x,|0|()) p5: cond#(true(),x) -> p#(x) p6: even#(s(s(x))) -> even#(x) p7: gr#(s(x),s(y())) -> gr#(x,y()) and R consists of: r1: cond(true(),x) -> cond(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) r2: and(x,false()) -> false() r3: and(false(),x) -> false() r4: and(true(),true()) -> true() r5: even(|0|()) -> true() r6: even(s(|0|())) -> false() r7: even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) r8: gr(|0|(),x) -> false() r9: gr(s(x),|0|()) -> true() r10: gr(s(x),s(y())) -> gr(x,y()) r11: p(|0|()) -> |0|() r12: p(s(x)) -> x The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} {p6} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: cond#(true(),x) -> cond#(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) and R consists of: r1: cond(true(),x) -> cond(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) r2: and(x,false()) -> false() r3: and(false(),x) -> false() r4: and(true(),true()) -> true() r5: even(|0|()) -> true() r6: even(s(|0|())) -> false() r7: even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) r8: gr(|0|(),x) -> false() r9: gr(s(x),|0|()) -> true() r10: gr(s(x),s(y())) -> gr(x,y()) r11: p(|0|()) -> |0|() r12: p(s(x)) -> x The set of usable rules consists of r2, r3, r4, r6, r8, r9, r11, r12 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: cond#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 60, x2 + 66} true_A = 17 and_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x2 + 1} even_A(x1) = 8 gr_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 22} |0|_A = 8 p_A(x1) = max{10, x1 - 1} false_A = 2 s_A(x1) = max{40, x1 + 21} base order 2: marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!): matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order: carrier: N^1 order: standard order interpretations: cond#_A(x1,x2) = 0 true_A() = 6 and_A(x1,x2) = 6 even_A(x1) = x1 + 1 gr_A(x1,x2) = 6 |0|_A() = 4 p_A(x1) = x1 + 1 false_A() = 1 s_A(x1) = x1 + 4 cond#!_A(x1,x2) = 10 true!_A() = 5 and!_A(x1,x2) = 11 even!_A(x1) = x1 gr!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 4 |0|!_A() = 8 p!_A(x1) = 9 false!_A() = 7 s!_A(x1) = 6 partial status: pi(cond#) = [2] pi(true) = [] pi(and) = [2] pi(even) = [] pi(gr) = [] pi(|0|) = [] pi(p) = [] pi(false) = [] pi(s) = [1] The following rules are removed: p1 Then no dependency pair remains. -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: even#(s(s(x))) -> even#(x) and R consists of: r1: cond(true(),x) -> cond(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) r2: and(x,false()) -> false() r3: and(false(),x) -> false() r4: and(true(),true()) -> true() r5: even(|0|()) -> true() r6: even(s(|0|())) -> false() r7: even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) r8: gr(|0|(),x) -> false() r9: gr(s(x),|0|()) -> true() r10: gr(s(x),s(y())) -> gr(x,y()) r11: p(|0|()) -> |0|() r12: p(s(x)) -> x The set of usable rules consists of (no rules) Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: even#_A(x1) = 3 s_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 12} base order 2: marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!): matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order: carrier: N^1 order: standard order interpretations: even#_A(x1) = 0 s_A(x1) = x1 + 5 even#!_A(x1) = x1 + 4 s!_A(x1) = 3 partial status: pi(even#) = [] pi(s) = [] The following rules are removed: p1 Then no dependency pair remains.