YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  minus(x,|0|()) -> x
  minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
  plus(|0|(),y) -> y
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
  minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
  app(nil(),k) -> k
  app(l,nil()) -> l
  app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
  sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
  sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
  sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p2: quot#(s(x),s(y)) -> quot#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p3: quot#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p4: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p5: minus#(minus(x,y),z) -> minus#(x,plus(y,z))
p6: minus#(minus(x,y),z) -> plus#(y,z)
p7: app#(cons(x,l),k) -> app#(l,k)
p8: sum#(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum#(cons(plus(x,y),l))
p9: sum#(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> plus#(x,y)
p10: sum#(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum#(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))
p11: sum#(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> app#(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k))))
p12: sum#(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum#(cons(x,cons(y,k)))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r7: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r8: app(nil(),k) -> k
r9: app(l,nil()) -> l
r10: app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
r11: sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
r12: sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
r13: sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}
  {p1, p5}
  {p10}
  {p8}
  {p4}
  {p7}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: quot#(s(x),s(y)) -> quot#(minus(x,y),s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r7: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r8: app(nil(),k) -> k
r9: app(l,nil()) -> l
r10: app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
r11: sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
r12: sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
r13: sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r5, r6, r7

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        quot#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 36, x2 - 1}
        s_A(x1) = max{37, x1}
        minus_A(x1,x2) = max{37, x1}
        |0|_A = 1
        plus_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2 + 36}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          quot#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 9, x2 - 17}
          s_A(x1) = max{8, x1}
          minus_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1, x2 - 9}
          |0|_A = 5
          plus_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x1 - 12, x2}
          quot#!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 2, x2 + 12}
          s!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 + 1}
          minus!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 9}
          |0|!_A = 2
          plus!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 9, x2 + 13}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(quot#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(minus) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(plus) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p2: minus#(minus(x,y),z) -> minus#(x,plus(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r7: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r8: app(nil(),k) -> k
r9: app(l,nil()) -> l
r10: app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
r11: sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
r12: sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
r13: sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r5, r6

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        minus#_A(x1,x2) = 1
        s_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 11}
        minus_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x1 - 10, x2 - 8}
        plus_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 7, x2 + 1}
        |0|_A = 0
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          minus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 12, x2 - 90}
          s_A(x1) = max{2, x1}
          minus_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x1 + 2, x2 - 99}
          plus_A(x1,x2) = max{89, x1 - 21, x2}
          |0|_A = 2
          minus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{6, x1 - 3}
          s!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 191}
          minus!_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 11, x2 - 101}
          plus!_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 101, x2 - 1}
          |0|!_A = 0
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus#) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(minus) = []
      pi(plus) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p2



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r7: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r8: app(nil(),k) -> k
r9: app(l,nil()) -> l
r10: app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
r11: sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
r12: sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
r13: sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r7: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r8: app(nil(),k) -> k
r9: app(l,nil()) -> l
r10: app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
r11: sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
r12: sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
r13: sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        minus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
        s_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 32}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          minus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 6, x2 - 6}
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 5
          minus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 1, x2 - 8}
          s!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 7}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus#) = []
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: sum#(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum#(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r7: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r8: app(nil(),k) -> k
r9: app(l,nil()) -> l
r10: app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
r11: sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
r12: sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
r13: sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r5, r6, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        sum#_A(x1) = max{4, x1}
        app_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x1 + 9, x2 + 5}
        cons_A(x1,x2) = max{12, x1 + 2, x2}
        sum_A(x1) = max{8, x1}
        plus_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x1 - 4, x2}
        |0|_A = 1
        s_A(x1) = 5
        nil_A = 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          sum#_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 30}
          app_A(x1,x2) = max{25, x1 + 1, x2 + 10}
          cons_A(x1,x2) = max{19, x1 - 12, x2}
          sum_A(x1) = max{16, x1}
          plus_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x1 - 18, x2}
          |0|_A = 31
          s_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 27}
          nil_A = 17
          sum#!_A(x1) = x1 + 6
          app!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 30, x2 + 29}
          cons!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 18
          sum!_A(x1) = 36
          plus!_A(x1,x2) = max{38, x2 + 19}
          |0|!_A = 0
          s!_A(x1) = max{20, x1 - 91}
          nil!_A = 1
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(sum#) = [1]
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(cons) = []
      pi(sum) = []
      pi(plus) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(nil) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: sum#(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum#(cons(plus(x,y),l))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r7: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r8: app(nil(),k) -> k
r9: app(l,nil()) -> l
r10: app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
r11: sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
r12: sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
r13: sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r5, r6

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        sum#_A(x1) = 0
        cons_A(x1,x2) = max{25, x1 - 5, x2 - 9}
        plus_A(x1,x2) = max{26, x1 - 10, x2 + 7}
        |0|_A = 7
        s_A(x1) = max{8, x1 - 27}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          sum#_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 47}
          cons_A(x1,x2) = max{37, x1 - 20, x2 + 9}
          plus_A(x1,x2) = max{39, x1 - 94, x2 + 8}
          |0|_A = 82
          s_A(x1) = max{9, x1 - 40}
          sum#!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 35}
          cons!_A(x1,x2) = max{39, x1 - 53, x2 - 89}
          plus!_A(x1,x2) = max{41, x1 - 55, x2 - 45}
          |0|!_A = 0
          s!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 191}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(sum#) = []
      pi(cons) = []
      pi(plus) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r7: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r8: app(nil(),k) -> k
r9: app(l,nil()) -> l
r10: app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
r11: sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
r12: sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
r13: sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        plus#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 4
        s_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 12}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 11}
          s_A(x1) = max{14, x1 + 10}
          plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 1}
          s!_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 17}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = []
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(cons(x,l),k) -> app#(l,k)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r5: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r7: minus(minus(x,y),z) -> minus(x,plus(y,z))
r8: app(nil(),k) -> k
r9: app(l,nil()) -> l
r10: app(cons(x,l),k) -> cons(x,app(l,k))
r11: sum(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(x,nil())
r12: sum(cons(x,cons(y,l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x,y),l))
r13: sum(app(l,cons(x,cons(y,k)))) -> sum(app(l,sum(cons(x,cons(y,k)))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        app#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
        cons_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 9, x2 - 13}
  
    base order 2:
  
      marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
        
          app#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 9}
          cons_A(x1,x2) = max{57, x1 + 44, x2 + 8}
          app#!_A(x1,x2) = max{11, x1 - 45}
          cons!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 50, x2 - 72}
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(app#) = []
      pi(cons) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.