YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  f(x,c(y)) -> f(x,s(f(y,y)))
  f(s(x),y) -> f(x,s(c(y)))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(x,c(y)) -> f#(x,s(f(y,y)))
p2: f#(x,c(y)) -> f#(y,y)
p3: f#(s(x),y) -> f#(x,s(c(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: f(x,c(y)) -> f(x,s(f(y,y)))
r2: f(s(x),y) -> f(x,s(c(y)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}
  {p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(x,c(y)) -> f#(y,y)

and R consists of:

r1: f(x,c(y)) -> f(x,s(f(y,y)))
r2: f(s(x),y) -> f(x,s(c(y)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      model-based reduction triple (=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        finite algebra:
        
          carrier: {0,1}
          interpretations:
            f#_A(0,0) = 0
            f#_A(0,1) = 0
            f#_A(1,0) = 0
            f#_A(1,1) = 0
            c_A(0) = 1
            c_A(1) = 0
            f_A(0,0) = 0
            f_A(0,1) = 0
            f_A(1,0) = 0
            f_A(1,1) = 0
            s_A(0) = 1
            s_A(1) = 1
            f#!_A(0,0) = 0
            f#!_A(0,1) = 0
            f#!_A(1,0) = 0
            f#!_A(1,1) = 0
            c!_A(0) = 1
            c!_A(1) = 1
            f!_A(0,0) = 0
            f!_A(0,1) = 0
            f!_A(1,0) = 0
            f!_A(1,1) = 0
            s!_A(0) = 0
            s!_A(1) = 1
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(f#) = [2]
      pi(c) = [1]
      pi(f) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(s(x),y) -> f#(x,s(c(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: f(x,c(y)) -> f(x,s(f(y,y)))
r2: f(s(x),y) -> f(x,s(c(y)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      model-based reduction triple (=A, >=A!, >A!):
      
        finite algebra:
        
          carrier: {0,1}
          interpretations:
            f#_A(0,0) = 0
            f#_A(0,1) = 0
            f#_A(1,0) = 0
            f#_A(1,1) = 0
            s_A(0) = 1
            s_A(1) = 0
            c_A(0) = 0
            c_A(1) = 0
            f_A(0,0) = 0
            f_A(0,1) = 0
            f_A(1,0) = 0
            f_A(1,1) = 0
            f#!_A(0,0) = 1
            f#!_A(0,1) = 0
            f#!_A(1,0) = 0
            f#!_A(1,1) = 0
            s!_A(0) = 1
            s!_A(1) = 1
            c!_A(0) = 0
            c!_A(1) = 0
            f!_A(0,0) = 0
            f!_A(0,1) = 0
            f!_A(1,0) = 0
            f!_A(1,1) = 0
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(f#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(c) = []
      pi(f) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.