YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
  times(x,s(y)) -> plus(times(x,y),x)
  plus(x,|0|()) -> x
  plus(|0|(),x) -> x
  plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: times#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(times(x,y),x)
p2: times#(x,s(y)) -> times#(x,y)
p3: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,y)
p4: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: times(x,s(y)) -> plus(times(x,y),x)
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),x) -> x
r5: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}
  {p3, p4}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: times#(x,s(y)) -> times#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: times(x,s(y)) -> plus(times(x,y),x)
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),x) -> x
r5: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              times#_A(x1,x2) = x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              times#!_A(x1,x2) = x2
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 1
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              times#_A(x1,x2) = x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              times#!_A(x1,x2) = 1
              s!_A(x1) = 2
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(times#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: times(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: times(x,s(y)) -> plus(times(x,y),x)
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),x) -> x
r5: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              plus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
              s!_A(x1) = 3
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              plus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
              s!_A(x1) = 1
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.