YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  minus(x,|0|()) -> x
  minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
  double(|0|()) -> |0|()
  double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
  plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
  plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
  plus(zero(),y) -> y
  plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
  id(x) -> x
  if(true(),x,y) -> x
  if(false(),x,y) -> y
  not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
  gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
  gt(zero(),y) -> false()
  gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p2: double#(s(x)) -> double#(x)
p3: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p4: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> if#(gt(x,y),x,y)
p5: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> gt#(x,y)
p6: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))
p7: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> not#(gt(x,y))
p8: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> id#(x)
p9: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> id#(y)
p10: plus#(s(x),x) -> plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
p11: plus#(s(x),x) -> if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x))
p12: plus#(s(x),x) -> gt#(x,x)
p13: plus#(s(x),x) -> id#(x)
p14: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> plus#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))
p15: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> if#(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))
p16: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> gt#(s(y),y)
p17: not#(x) -> if#(x,false(),true())
p18: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> gt#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: double(|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
r5: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r6: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r7: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r8: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r9: id(x) -> x
r10: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r11: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r12: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r13: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r14: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r15: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}
  {p2}
  {p3, p10, p14}
  {p18}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: double(|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
r5: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r6: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r7: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r8: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r9: id(x) -> x
r10: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r11: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r12: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r13: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r14: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r15: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r7

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              minus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              plus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              zero_A() = 1
              minus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
              s!_A(x1) = 3
              plus!_A(x1,x2) = 4
              zero!_A() = 1
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            minus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = max{27, x1 - 81}
            plus_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 29, x2 + 70}
            zero_A = 0
            minus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 73}
            s!_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 72}
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 97}
            zero!_A = 1
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus#) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(plus) = [1, 2]
      pi(zero) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: double#(s(x)) -> double#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: double(|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
r5: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r6: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r7: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r8: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r9: id(x) -> x
r10: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r11: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r12: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r13: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r14: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r15: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              double#_A(x1) = x1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              double#!_A(x1) = x1 + 7
              s!_A(x1) = 6
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            double#_A(x1) = x1
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 20
            double#!_A(x1) = max{59, x1 - 21}
            s!_A(x1) = max{58, x1 + 11}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(double#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p2: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> plus#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))
p3: plus#(s(x),x) -> plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: double(|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
r5: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r6: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r7: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r8: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r9: id(x) -> x
r10: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r11: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r12: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r13: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r14: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r15: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              plus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 5
              if_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 4
              gt_A(x1,x2) = 1
              not_A(x1) = 6
              id_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              true_A() = 1
              false_A() = 1
              zero_A() = 1
              plus#!_A(x1,x2) = 0
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 5
              gt!_A(x1,x2) = 1
              not!_A(x1) = 12
              id!_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              true!_A() = 0
              false!_A() = 0
              zero!_A() = 1
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 153, x2 - 153}
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 26
            if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{15, x2, x3}
            gt_A(x1,x2) = max{9, x1 - 58, x2 - 1}
            not_A(x1) = max{15, x1 - 88}
            id_A(x1) = max{14, x1}
            true_A = 1
            false_A = 9
            zero_A = 0
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 4, x2 + 2}
            s!_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 26}
            if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{31, x2 - 15, x3 - 6}
            gt!_A(x1,x2) = max{31, x1 - 113, x2 - 128}
            not!_A(x1) = max{32, x1 - 68}
            id!_A(x1) = 0
            true!_A = 0
            false!_A = 0
            zero!_A = 1
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(if) = [2, 3]
      pi(gt) = []
      pi(not) = []
      pi(id) = [1]
      pi(true) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(zero) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p3



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> plus#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: double(|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
r5: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r6: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r7: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r8: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r9: id(x) -> x
r10: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r11: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r12: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r13: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r14: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r15: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(id(x),s(y)) -> plus#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: double(|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
r5: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r6: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r7: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r8: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r9: id(x) -> x
r10: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r11: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r12: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r13: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r14: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r15: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r10, r11, r13, r14, r15

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1
              id_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              s_A(x1) = x1
              if_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3
              gt_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
              true_A() = 1
              false_A() = 1
              zero_A() = 1
              plus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1
              id!_A(x1) = x1 + 8
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 3
              if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 3
              gt!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
              true!_A() = 0
              false!_A() = 0
              zero!_A() = 1
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 239, x2 - 133}
            id_A(x1) = x1 + 145
            s_A(x1) = max{73, x1 + 54}
            if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{132, x1 + 22, x2 + 2, x3}
            gt_A(x1,x2) = max{25, x1 - 55, x2 - 280}
            true_A = 25
            false_A = 25
            zero_A = 0
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{23, x1 - 1, x2 - 48}
            id!_A(x1) = x1 + 1
            s!_A(x1) = max{278, x1 + 258}
            if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{22, x1 - 1, x2 - 184, x3 - 128}
            gt!_A(x1,x2) = max{277, x1 - 37}
            true!_A = 276
            false!_A = 1
            zero!_A = 277
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [1]
      pi(id) = [1]
      pi(s) = []
      pi(if) = [1, 2, 3]
      pi(gt) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(zero) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> gt#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r3: double(|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x)))
r5: plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r6: plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r7: plus(zero(),y) -> y
r8: plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r9: id(x) -> x
r10: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r11: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r12: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r13: gt(s(x),zero()) -> true()
r14: gt(zero(),y) -> false()
r15: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              gt#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              gt#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 6
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 5
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            gt#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = max{12, x1 - 63}
            gt#!_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 13}
            s!_A(x1) = max{9, x1 - 25}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(gt#) = []
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.