YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  half(|0|()) -> |0|()
  half(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
  half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
  lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|()
  lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|())
  lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
  conv(|0|()) -> cons(nil(),|0|())
  conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))),lastbit(s(x)))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: half#(s(s(x))) -> half#(x)
p2: lastbit#(s(s(x))) -> lastbit#(x)
p3: conv#(s(x)) -> conv#(half(s(x)))
p4: conv#(s(x)) -> half#(s(x))
p5: conv#(s(x)) -> lastbit#(s(x))

and R consists of:

r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: half(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r3: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
r4: lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|())
r6: lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
r7: conv(|0|()) -> cons(nil(),|0|())
r8: conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))),lastbit(s(x)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p3}
  {p1}
  {p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: conv#(s(x)) -> conv#(half(s(x)))

and R consists of:

r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: half(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r3: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
r4: lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|())
r6: lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
r7: conv(|0|()) -> cons(nil(),|0|())
r8: conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))),lastbit(s(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            conv#_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 25}
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 24
            half_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 18}
            |0|_A = 1
            conv#!_A(x1) = x1 + 4
            s!_A(x1) = max{14, x1 + 11}
            half!_A(x1) = max{13, x1 - 16}
            |0|!_A = 12
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              conv#_A(x1) = x1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              half_A(x1) = x1
              |0|_A() = 2
              conv#!_A(x1) = x1
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              half!_A(x1) = 0
              |0|!_A() = 4
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(conv#) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(half) = []
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: half#(s(s(x))) -> half#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: half(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r3: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
r4: lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|())
r6: lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
r7: conv(|0|()) -> cons(nil(),|0|())
r8: conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))),lastbit(s(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            half#_A(x1) = 0
            s_A(x1) = max{21, x1 - 10}
            half#!_A(x1) = 0
            s!_A(x1) = max{7, x1 + 4}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              half#_A(x1) = x1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              half#!_A(x1) = x1
              s!_A(x1) = 1
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(half#) = []
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: lastbit#(s(s(x))) -> lastbit#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: half(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r3: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
r4: lastbit(|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: lastbit(s(|0|())) -> s(|0|())
r6: lastbit(s(s(x))) -> lastbit(x)
r7: conv(|0|()) -> cons(nil(),|0|())
r8: conv(s(x)) -> cons(conv(half(s(x))),lastbit(s(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            lastbit#_A(x1) = 0
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
            lastbit#!_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 5}
            s!_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 1}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              lastbit#_A(x1) = x1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              lastbit#!_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              s!_A(x1) = 2
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(lastbit#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.