YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  le(|0|(),y) -> true()
  le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
  le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
  minus(x,|0|()) -> x
  minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
  mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
  mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
  if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
  if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: le#(s(x),s(y)) -> le#(x,y)
p2: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p3: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod#(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
p4: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> le#(y,x)
p5: if_mod#(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p6: if_mod#(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r5: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r6: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r7: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r8: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r9: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r10: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p3, p5}
  {p1}
  {p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if_mod#(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p2: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod#(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r5: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r6: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r7: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r8: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r9: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r10: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            if_mod#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{0, x1 - 6, x2 - 45, x3 - 34}
            true_A = 1
            s_A(x1) = max{32, x1 + 20}
            mod#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 35, x2 - 34}
            minus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
            le_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x2 - 22}
            |0|_A = 21
            false_A = 2
            if_mod#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{29, x1 + 20, x2 - 5}
            true!_A = 3
            s!_A(x1) = max{17, x1 + 14}
            mod#!_A(x1,x2) = max{26, x1 - 2}
            minus!_A(x1,x2) = max{28, x1 - 33}
            le!_A(x1,x2) = max{31, x1 - 19}
            |0|!_A = 16
            false!_A = 15
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              if_mod#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3
              true_A() = 1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              mod#_A(x1,x2) = x2
              minus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
              le_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
              |0|_A() = 2
              false_A() = 1
              if_mod#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 2
              true!_A() = 1
              s!_A(x1) = 7
              mod#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 4
              minus!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 9
              le!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              |0|!_A() = 2
              false!_A() = 0
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(if_mod#) = [2]
      pi(true) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(mod#) = [1]
      pi(minus) = [1]
      pi(le) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(false) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: le#(s(x),s(y)) -> le#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r5: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r6: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r7: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r8: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r9: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r10: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            le#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2}
            s_A(x1) = max{14, x1 + 8}
            le#!_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 2}
            s!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 9}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              le#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 5
              le#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
              s!_A(x1) = 3
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(le#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r5: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r6: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r7: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r8: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r9: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r10: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r4

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            minus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = max{9, x1 + 1}
            minus_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 33, x2 + 12}
            |0|_A = 2
            minus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{6, x1 - 2, x2 - 10}
            s!_A(x1) = max{5, x1 - 22}
            minus!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 10, x2 - 10}
            |0|!_A = 2
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              minus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              minus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
              |0|_A() = 2
              minus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
              s!_A(x1) = 2
              minus!_A(x1,x2) = 5
              |0|!_A() = 1
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(minus) = [1, 2]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.