YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  plus(x,|0|()) -> x
  plus(|0|(),y) -> y
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
  times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
  times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
  div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
  quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
  div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
  eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
  eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
  eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
  eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
  divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
  prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
  pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
  pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
  if(true(),x,y) -> false()
  if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: times#(s(x),y) -> plus#(y,times(x,y))
p3: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)
p4: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p5: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p6: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p7: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(y,z))
p8: div#(div(x,y),z) -> times#(y,z)
p9: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)
p10: divides#(y,x) -> eq#(x,times(div(x,y),y))
p11: divides#(y,x) -> times#(div(x,y),y)
p12: divides#(y,x) -> div#(x,y)
p13: prime#(s(s(x))) -> pr#(s(s(x)),s(x))
p14: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
p15: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> divides#(s(s(y)),x)
p16: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r3: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r4: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r6: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r7: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r9: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r10: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r11: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r12: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r13: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r14: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r15: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r16: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r17: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r18: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r19: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r20: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r21: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r22: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p14, p16}
  {p4, p5, p6, p7}
  {p3}
  {p1}
  {p9}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)
p2: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r3: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r4: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r6: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r7: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r9: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r10: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r11: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r12: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r13: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r14: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r15: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r16: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r17: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r18: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r19: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r20: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r21: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r22: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r13, r14, r15, r16, r17

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{0, x1 - 60, x2 - 47, x3 - 24}
            false_A = 2
            pr#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 47, x2 - 45}
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 21
            divides_A(x1,x2) = max{59, x1 - 5}
            eq_A(x1,x2) = 2
            |0|_A = 22
            true_A = 2
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 57}
            div_A(x1,x2) = max{16, x1 - 78, x2 - 41}
            if#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{9, x1 - 28, x3 - 10}
            false!_A = 11
            pr#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 11}
            s!_A(x1) = max{27, x1 + 10}
            divides!_A(x1,x2) = max{32, x1 - 8, x2 - 16}
            eq!_A(x1,x2) = max{32, x1 - 23}
            |0|!_A = 33
            true!_A = 28
            times!_A(x1,x2) = max{32, x1 - 23, x2 - 8}
            div!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 77, x2 + 94}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3
              false_A() = 1
              pr#_A(x1,x2) = x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 7
              divides_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
              eq_A(x1,x2) = 2
              |0|_A() = 3
              true_A() = 2
              times_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
              div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              if#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3 + 8
              false!_A() = 1
              pr#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 7
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 9
              divides!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 6
              eq!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 6
              |0|!_A() = 8
              true!_A() = 0
              times!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 4
              div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 14
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(pr#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(divides) = [2]
      pi(eq) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(times) = []
      pi(div) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(y,z))
p2: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p4: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r3: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r4: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r6: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r7: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r9: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r10: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r11: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r12: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r13: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r14: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r15: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r16: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r17: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r18: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r19: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r20: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r21: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r22: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r5, r7

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 25}
            div_A(x1,x2) = max{24, x1 + 21, x2 - 119}
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 145, x2 + 29}
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{1, x1 - 25}
            |0|_A = 1
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 63
            plus_A(x1,x2) = max{54, x1 + 53, x2 + 19}
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
            div!_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x1 - 22, x2 - 145}
            times!_A(x1,x2) = max{32, x1 - 62, x2 - 7}
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + 7
            |0|!_A = 3
            s!_A(x1) = max{5, x1 - 20}
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = max{33, x2 - 30}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              div#_A(x1,x2) = x1
              div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
              times_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 8
              quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1
              |0|_A() = 9
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 3
              plus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
              div#!_A(x1,x2) = 2
              div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              times!_A(x1,x2) = x1
              quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 2
              |0|!_A() = 3
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 5
              plus!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 6
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(div) = []
      pi(times) = [1, 2]
      pi(quot#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(plus) = [1, 2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p4



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r3: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r4: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r6: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r7: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r9: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r10: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r11: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r12: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r13: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r14: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r15: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r16: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r17: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r18: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r19: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r20: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r21: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r22: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r3: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r4: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r6: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r7: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r9: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r10: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r11: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r12: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r13: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r14: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r15: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r16: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r17: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r18: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r19: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r20: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r21: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r22: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r7

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 2, x2 - 15}
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{0, x1 - 2, x2 - 15, x3 - 15}
            |0|_A = 7
            s_A(x1) = max{14, x1 + 4}
            div_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 7}
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 + 1, x2 - 15}
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{2, x1 + 1, x2 - 15, x3 - 15}
            |0|!_A = 0
            s!_A(x1) = 0
            div!_A(x1,x2) = 0
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              div#_A(x1,x2) = x2
              quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3
              |0|_A() = 6
              s_A(x1) = 4
              div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
              div#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 3
              quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + 2
              |0|!_A() = 6
              s!_A(x1) = 9
              div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(quot#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(div) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r3: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r4: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r6: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r7: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r9: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r10: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r11: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r12: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r13: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r14: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r15: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r16: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r17: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r18: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r19: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r20: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r21: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r22: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            times#_A(x1,x2) = x1
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 13
            times#!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 1}
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 28
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              times#_A(x1,x2) = x1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              times#!_A(x1,x2) = x1
              s!_A(x1) = 4
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(times#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r3: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r4: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r6: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r7: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r9: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r10: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r11: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r12: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r13: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r14: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r15: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r16: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r17: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r18: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r19: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r20: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r21: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r22: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1
            s_A(x1) = max{14, x1}
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{25, x1 + 24}
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 25
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              plus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 7
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r3: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r4: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r6: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r7: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r9: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r10: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r11: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r12: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r13: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r14: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r15: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r16: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r17: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r18: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r19: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r20: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r21: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r22: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            eq#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2}
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 24
            eq#!_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 19, x2 - 13}
            s!_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 14}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              eq#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              eq#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 6
              s!_A(x1) = 5
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(eq#) = []
      pi(s) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.