YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  p(|0|()) -> |0|()
  p(s(x)) -> x
  plus(x,|0|()) -> x
  plus(|0|(),y) -> y
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
  plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
  times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
  times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
  div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
  quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
  div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
  eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
  eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
  eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
  eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
  divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
  prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
  pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
  pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
  if(true(),x,y) -> false()
  if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)
p3: plus#(s(x),y) -> p#(s(x))
p4: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p5: plus#(x,s(y)) -> p#(s(y))
p6: times#(s(x),y) -> plus#(y,times(x,y))
p7: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)
p8: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p9: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p10: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p11: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(y,z))
p12: div#(div(x,y),z) -> times#(y,z)
p13: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)
p14: divides#(y,x) -> eq#(x,times(div(x,y),y))
p15: divides#(y,x) -> times#(div(x,y),y)
p16: divides#(y,x) -> div#(x,y)
p17: prime#(s(s(x))) -> pr#(s(s(x)),s(x))
p18: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
p19: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> divides#(s(s(y)),x)
p20: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p18, p20}
  {p8, p9, p10, p11}
  {p7}
  {p1, p2, p4}
  {p13}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)
p2: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r17, r18, r19, r20, r21

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{1, x3 - 11}
            false_A = 11
            pr#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 22}
            s_A(x1) = 11
            divides_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 13
            eq_A(x1,x2) = 13
            |0|_A = 11
            true_A = 13
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 11, x2 - 11}
            div_A(x1,x2) = x2
            if#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{9, x1 - 1}
            false!_A = 1
            pr#!_A(x1,x2) = 10
            s!_A(x1) = max{24, x1 - 3}
            divides!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 26
            eq!_A(x1,x2) = 25
            |0|!_A = 28
            true!_A = 9
            times!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 17
            div!_A(x1,x2) = max{27, x2 - 2}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3
              false_A() = 1
              pr#_A(x1,x2) = x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 6
              divides_A(x1,x2) = 2
              eq_A(x1,x2) = 2
              |0|_A() = 4
              true_A() = 2
              times_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 3
              div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
              if#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 16
              false!_A() = 15
              pr#!_A(x1,x2) = 14
              s!_A(x1) = 17
              divides!_A(x1,x2) = x1
              eq!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 13
              |0|!_A() = 18
              true!_A() = 16
              times!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 18
              div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 17
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = [3]
      pi(false) = []
      pi(pr#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(divides) = []
      pi(eq) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(times) = [2]
      pi(div) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(y,z))
p2: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p4: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r3, r4, r9, r11, r13

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 55}
            div_A(x1,x2) = max{54, x1 + 7}
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{56, x1 + 7, x2 + 7}
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{1, x1 - 55}
            |0|_A = 0
            s_A(x1) = max{56, x1 + 20}
            plus_A(x1,x2) = max{64, x1 + 8, x2 + 8}
            quot_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{55, x1 - 21, x2 - 57, x3 - 56}
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = max{19, x1 + 13}
            div!_A(x1,x2) = max{11, x2 + 9}
            times!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 7, x2 + 37}
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{19, x1 + 13}
            |0|!_A = 8
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 43
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = max{43, x1 + 36}
            quot!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{10, x2 - 13}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              div#_A(x1,x2) = x1
              div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
              times_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1
              |0|_A() = 2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 3
              plus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
              quot_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + 2
              div#!_A(x1,x2) = 5
              div!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 4
              times!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
              quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 5
              |0|!_A() = 2
              s!_A(x1) = 6
              plus!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 4
              quot!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 3
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(div) = []
      pi(times) = [2]
      pi(quot#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(plus) = [1, 2]
      pi(quot) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p4



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 2, x2 - 31}
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{1, x1 - 2, x2 - 42}
            |0|_A = 40
            s_A(x1) = 30
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x2 - 25}
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{6, x2 - 32, x3 - 26}
            |0|!_A = 10
            s!_A(x1) = 9
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              div#_A(x1,x2) = x2
              quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3
              |0|_A() = 20
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 13
              div#!_A(x1,x2) = 23
              quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 22
              |0|!_A() = 24
              s!_A(x1) = 27
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(quot#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            times#_A(x1,x2) = x1
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 43
            times#!_A(x1,x2) = max{21, x1 - 21}
            s!_A(x1) = max{37, x1 + 20}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              times#_A(x1,x2) = x1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              times#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 6
              s!_A(x1) = 5
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(times#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p3: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 19, x2 - 19}
            s_A(x1) = max{18, x1 + 4}
            p_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 4}
            |0|_A = 1
            div_A(x1,x2) = max{96, x1 + 32, x2 - 32}
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x2 + 1}
            s!_A(x1) = 8
            p!_A(x1) = 6
            |0|!_A = 27
            div!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 2, x2 + 29}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              p_A(x1) = x1
              |0|_A() = 5
              div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              plus#!_A(x1,x2) = 16
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 10
              p!_A(x1) = x1 + 14
              |0|!_A() = 13
              div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 14
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(p) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(div) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p2



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r8, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x2 - 1}
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 11
            p_A(x1) = max{11, x1}
            |0|_A = 0
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x1 - 11}
            div_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 + 1, x2 - 4}
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = 20
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 21
            p!_A(x1) = 32
            |0|!_A = 29
            times!_A(x1,x2) = max{33, x1 - 25, x2 - 1}
            div!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 30, x2 + 5}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              plus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              p_A(x1) = x1
              |0|_A() = 13
              times_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 4
              div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
              plus#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 6
              p!_A(x1) = x1
              |0|!_A() = 12
              times!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 11
              div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(p) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(times) = []
      pi(div) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r11, r17, r19

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 21, x2 - 11}
            s_A(x1) = max{20, x1 + 15}
            p_A(x1) = max{16, x1 - 9}
            |0|_A = 2
            div_A(x1,x2) = max{66, x1 - 67}
            eq_A(x1,x2) = max{50, x1 - 21, x2 - 33}
            true_A = 2
            false_A = 2
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 13}
            s!_A(x1) = max{45, x1 + 25}
            p!_A(x1) = max{46, x1 - 12}
            |0|!_A = 44
            div!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 148, x2 + 48}
            eq!_A(x1,x2) = max{28, x1 + 13}
            true!_A = 28
            false!_A = 1
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              plus#_A(x1,x2) = 0
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              p_A(x1) = x1
              |0|_A() = 3
              div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              eq_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              true_A() = 6
              false_A() = 5
              plus#!_A(x1,x2) = 10
              s!_A(x1) = 5
              p!_A(x1) = 9
              |0|!_A() = 3
              div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
              eq!_A(x1,x2) = 3
              true!_A() = 2
              false!_A() = 1
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(p) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(div) = [2]
      pi(eq) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(false) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: p(s(x)) -> x
r3: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r4: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r6: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r7: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r8: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r10: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r11: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r12: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r13: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r14: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r15: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r16: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r17: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r18: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r19: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r20: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r21: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r22: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r23: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r24: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r25: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r26: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r8, r11

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            eq#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = 0
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2 - 6}
            |0|_A = 0
            div_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 3, x2 - 1}
            eq#!_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s!_A(x1) = 0
            times!_A(x1,x2) = 4
            |0|!_A = 0
            div!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 2, x2 + 9}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              eq#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 9
              times_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 2
              |0|_A() = 3
              div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              eq#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 7
              s!_A(x1) = 6
              times!_A(x1,x2) = 7
              |0|!_A() = 4
              div!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 8
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(eq#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(times) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(div) = [2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.