YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
  n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
  n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
  m(|0|(),y) -> y
  m(x,|0|()) -> x
  m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
  k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
  k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
  t(x) -> p(x,x)
  p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
  p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
  p(|0|(),y) -> y
  p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
  minus(x,|0|()) -> x
  minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
  id(x) -> x
  if(true(),x,y) -> x
  if(false(),x,y) -> y
  not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
  and(x,false()) -> false()
  and(true(),true()) -> true()
  f(|0|()) -> true()
  f(s(x)) -> h(x)
  h(|0|()) -> false()
  h(s(x)) -> f(x)
  gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
  gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
  gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> if#(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
p2: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> and#(f(s(x)),f(s(y)))
p3: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> f#(s(x))
p4: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> f#(s(y))
p5: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> t#(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|())))))
p6: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> g#(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))
p7: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> k#(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|())))
p8: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(m(x,y),n(x,y))
p9: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> m#(x,y)
p10: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> n#(x,y)
p11: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> k#(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|())))
p12: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> n#(s(x),s(y))
p13: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> g#(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y)))
p14: n#(s(x),s(y)) -> n#(x,y)
p15: m#(s(x),s(y)) -> m#(x,y)
p16: k#(s(x),s(y)) -> k#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p17: k#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p18: t#(x) -> p#(x,x)
p19: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> p#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p20: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> if#(gt(x,y),x,y)
p21: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> gt#(x,y)
p22: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))
p23: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> not#(gt(x,y))
p24: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> id#(x)
p25: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> id#(y)
p26: p#(s(x),x) -> p#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
p27: p#(s(x),x) -> if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x))
p28: p#(s(x),x) -> gt#(x,x)
p29: p#(s(x),x) -> id#(x)
p30: p#(id(x),s(y)) -> p#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))
p31: p#(id(x),s(y)) -> if#(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))
p32: p#(id(x),s(y)) -> gt#(s(y),y)
p33: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)
p34: not#(x) -> if#(x,false(),true())
p35: f#(s(x)) -> h#(x)
p36: h#(s(x)) -> f#(x)
p37: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> gt#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p6, p13}
  {p35, p36}
  {p16}
  {p33}
  {p15}
  {p14}
  {p19, p26, p30}
  {p37}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> g#(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y)))
p2: g#(s(x),s(y)) -> g#(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            g#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 228, x2 - 261}
            s_A(x1) = max{257, x1 + 231}
            minus_A(x1,x2) = max{17, x1}
            m_A(x1,x2) = max{218, x1 + 210, x2 + 33}
            n_A(x1,x2) = max{35, x1 + 12, x2 - 45}
            k_A(x1,x2) = max{34, x1 + 17}
            |0|_A = 35
            g#!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 188, x2 - 228}
            s!_A(x1) = 44
            minus!_A(x1,x2) = 300
            m!_A(x1,x2) = max{71, x1 - 186, x2 - 186}
            n!_A(x1,x2) = max{44, x1 - 258, x2 - 258}
            k!_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 213, x2 - 498}
            |0|!_A = 0
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              g#_A(x1,x2) = 0
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 9
              minus_A(x1,x2) = x1
              m_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 9
              n_A(x1,x2) = x2
              k_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
              |0|_A() = 0
              g#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 12
              s!_A(x1) = 19
              minus!_A(x1,x2) = x1
              m!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              n!_A(x1,x2) = 20
              k!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 23
              |0|!_A() = 22
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(g#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(minus) = [1]
      pi(m) = [1, 2]
      pi(n) = [2]
      pi(k) = []
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(s(x)) -> h#(x)
p2: h#(s(x)) -> f#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r3

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            f#_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 90}
            s_A(x1) = max{51, x1 + 38}
            h#_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 52}
            n_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 223
            |0|_A = 224
            f#!_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 66}
            s!_A(x1) = max{32, x1 - 65}
            h#!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 35}
            n!_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x2 - 102}
            |0|!_A = 28
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              f#_A(x1) = x1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              h#_A(x1) = x1
              n_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
              |0|_A() = 2
              f#!_A(x1) = x1 + 15
              s!_A(x1) = 14
              h#!_A(x1) = x1 + 12
              n!_A(x1,x2) = 13
              |0|!_A() = 12
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(f#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(h#) = []
      pi(n) = [2]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: k#(s(x),s(y)) -> k#(minus(x,y),s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            k#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 134, x2 - 126}
            s_A(x1) = max{124, x1 + 118}
            minus_A(x1,x2) = max{133, x1 + 118, x2 - 130}
            |0|_A = 128
            k#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 132, x2 - 380}
            s!_A(x1) = max{112, x1 - 384}
            minus!_A(x1,x2) = max{111, x1 - 13}
            |0|!_A = 131
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              k#_A(x1,x2) = x1
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 7
              minus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 6
              |0|_A() = 13
              k#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
              s!_A(x1) = 9
              minus!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 19
              |0|!_A() = 11
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(k#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(minus) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus#(s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r2, r3

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            minus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 8, x2 - 8}
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 7
            n_A(x1,x2) = max{148, x1 - 51, x2 + 141}
            |0|_A = 10
            minus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x2}
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 183
            n!_A(x1,x2) = max{194, x1 - 728}
            |0|!_A = 94
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              minus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              n_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              |0|_A() = 1
              minus#!_A(x1,x2) = 0
              s!_A(x1) = 9
              n!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              |0|!_A() = 0
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(n) = [1, 2]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: m#(s(x),s(y)) -> m#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r23

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            m#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 57, x2 - 57}
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 56
            f_A(x1) = max{66, x1 - 1}
            |0|_A = 58
            true_A = 47
            m#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 30}
            s!_A(x1) = max{53, x1 - 29}
            f!_A(x1) = max{55, x1 - 84}
            |0|!_A = 51
            true!_A = 50
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              m#_A(x1,x2) = 0
              s_A(x1) = 16
              f_A(x1) = 17
              |0|_A() = 2
              true_A() = 9
              m#!_A(x1,x2) = x1
              s!_A(x1) = 33
              f!_A(x1) = 31
              |0|!_A() = 32
              true!_A() = 29
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(m#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(f) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(true) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: n#(s(x),s(y)) -> n#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            n#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 100, x2 - 100}
            s_A(x1) = max{107, x1 + 99}
            n#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 100}
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 183
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              n#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 10
              n#!_A(x1,x2) = x2
              s!_A(x1) = x1 + 5
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(n#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> p#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p2: p#(id(x),s(y)) -> p#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))
p3: p#(s(x),x) -> p#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r17, r18, r19, r20, r27, r28, r29

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            p#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 45
            if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{34, x2 + 7, x3}
            gt_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 53, x2 + 72}
            not_A(x1) = max{99, x1 - 26}
            id_A(x1) = max{25, x1}
            true_A = 99
            false_A = 73
            |0|_A = 129
            p#!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 1140, x2 + 1095}
            s!_A(x1) = max{87, x1 + 83}
            if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x2 + 993, x3 - 100}
            gt!_A(x1,x2) = max{1186, x2 - 1}
            not!_A(x1) = max{1186, x1 + 1067}
            id!_A(x1) = x1 + 88
            true!_A = 84
            false!_A = 1068
            |0|!_A = 1069
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              p#_A(x1,x2) = 0
              s_A(x1) = 3
              if_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 4
              gt_A(x1,x2) = 2
              not_A(x1) = 8
              id_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              true_A() = 2
              false_A() = 2
              |0|_A() = 2
              p#!_A(x1,x2) = 4
              s!_A(x1) = 5
              if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 3
              gt!_A(x1,x2) = 11
              not!_A(x1) = 3
              id!_A(x1) = 8
              true!_A() = 0
              false!_A() = 2
              |0|!_A() = 4
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(p#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(if) = [2, 3]
      pi(gt) = [1]
      pi(not) = [1]
      pi(id) = [1]
      pi(true) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p3



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> p#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p2: p#(id(x),s(y)) -> p#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: p#(s(x),s(y)) -> p#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))
p2: p#(id(x),s(y)) -> p#(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r2, r3, r8, r17, r18, r19, r20, r27, r28, r29

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            p#_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 243, x2 - 245}
            s_A(x1) = max{242, x1 + 18}
            if_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{17, x1 - 452, x2 + 9, x3}
            gt_A(x1,x2) = max{470, x1 - 243, x2 - 407}
            not_A(x1) = max{470, x1 - 35}
            id_A(x1) = max{239, x1 + 9}
            n_A(x1,x2) = max{391, x1 - 243, x2 - 95}
            |0|_A = 212
            k_A(x1,x2) = max{453, x1, x2 - 265}
            true_A = 470
            false_A = 24
            p#!_A(x1,x2) = max{218, x1 - 19, x2 - 26}
            s!_A(x1) = 4
            if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{219, x1 - 676, x2 - 24, x3 - 35}
            gt!_A(x1,x2) = 217
            not!_A(x1) = max{436, x1 + 406}
            id!_A(x1) = 1
            n!_A(x1,x2) = max{47, x1 - 321, x2 - 693}
            |0|!_A = 3
            k!_A(x1,x2) = max{821, x1 + 493, x2 - 243}
            true!_A = 2
            false!_A = 199
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              p#_A(x1,x2) = 0
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 5
              if_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3
              gt_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 2
              not_A(x1) = x1 + 9
              id_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              n_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
              |0|_A() = 1
              k_A(x1,x2) = 1
              true_A() = 7
              false_A() = 2
              p#!_A(x1,x2) = 12
              s!_A(x1) = 7
              if!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 11
              gt!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 13
              not!_A(x1) = x1 + 12
              id!_A(x1) = 6
              n!_A(x1,x2) = 6
              |0|!_A() = 3
              k!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 3
              true!_A() = 0
              false!_A() = 2
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(p#) = [1, 2]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(if) = [2, 3]
      pi(gt) = []
      pi(not) = [1]
      pi(id) = [1]
      pi(n) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(k) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(false) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> gt#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: g(s(x),s(y)) -> if(and(f(s(x)),f(s(y))),t(g(k(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),s(s(|0|()))),k(n(s(x),s(y)),s(s(|0|()))))),g(minus(m(x,y),n(x,y)),n(s(x),s(y))))
r2: n(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r3: n(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r4: n(s(x),s(y)) -> s(n(x,y))
r5: m(|0|(),y) -> y
r6: m(x,|0|()) -> x
r7: m(s(x),s(y)) -> s(m(x,y))
r8: k(|0|(),s(y)) -> |0|()
r9: k(s(x),s(y)) -> s(k(minus(x,y),s(y)))
r10: t(x) -> p(x,x)
r11: p(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(p(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)))))
r12: p(s(x),x) -> p(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x))
r13: p(|0|(),y) -> y
r14: p(id(x),s(y)) -> s(p(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y))))
r15: minus(x,|0|()) -> x
r16: minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
r17: id(x) -> x
r18: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r19: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r20: not(x) -> if(x,false(),true())
r21: and(x,false()) -> false()
r22: and(true(),true()) -> true()
r23: f(|0|()) -> true()
r24: f(s(x)) -> h(x)
r25: h(|0|()) -> false()
r26: h(s(x)) -> f(x)
r27: gt(s(x),|0|()) -> true()
r28: gt(|0|(),y) -> false()
r29: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            gt#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 97, x2 - 97}
            s_A(x1) = max{197, x1 + 96}
            gt#!_A(x1,x2) = max{94, x1 - 1, x2 - 1}
            s!_A(x1) = max{488, x1 - 94}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              gt#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              s_A(x1) = x1 + 8
              gt#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 7
              s!_A(x1) = 6
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(gt#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.