YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
  +(|#|(),x) -> x
  +(x,|#|()) -> x
  +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
  +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
  +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
  +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
  +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
  -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
  -(x,|#|()) -> x
  -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
  -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
  -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
  -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
  not(true()) -> false()
  not(false()) -> true()
  if(true(),x,y) -> x
  if(false(),x,y) -> y
  ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
  ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
  ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
  ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
  ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
  ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
  ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
  log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
  |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
  |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
  |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|#(+(x,y))
p2: +#(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p3: +#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p4: +#(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p5: +#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|#(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
p6: +#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> +#(+(x,y),|1|(|#|()))
p7: +#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p8: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))
p9: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)
p10: -#(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|#(-(x,y))
p11: -#(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> -#(x,y)
p12: -#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> -#(-(x,y),|1|(|#|()))
p13: -#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> -#(x,y)
p14: -#(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> -#(x,y)
p15: -#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|#(-(x,y))
p16: -#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> -#(x,y)
p17: ge#(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge#(x,y)
p18: ge#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not#(ge(y,x))
p19: ge#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge#(y,x)
p20: ge#(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge#(x,y)
p21: ge#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge#(x,y)
p22: ge#(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge#(|#|(),x)
p23: log#(x) -> -#(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
p24: log#(x) -> |log'|#(x)
p25: |log'|#(|1|(x)) -> +#(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
p26: |log'|#(|1|(x)) -> |log'|#(x)
p27: |log'|#(|0|(x)) -> if#(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())
p28: |log'|#(|0|(x)) -> ge#(x,|1|(|#|()))
p29: |log'|#(|0|(x)) -> +#(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
p30: |log'|#(|0|(x)) -> |log'|#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p26, p30}
  {p2, p3, p4, p6, p7, p8, p9}
  {p11, p12, p13, p14, p16}
  {p17, p19, p20, p21}
  {p22}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: |log'|#(|0|(x)) -> |log'|#(x)
p2: |log'|#(|1|(x)) -> |log'|#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            |log'|#_A(x1) = 0
            |0|_A(x1) = 36
            |1|_A(x1) = x1 + 12
            |log'|#!_A(x1) = 1
            |0|!_A(x1) = 5
            |1|!_A(x1) = max{7, x1 - 73}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              |log'|#_A(x1) = x1
              |0|_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              |1|_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              |log'|#!_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              |0|!_A(x1) = 8
              |1|!_A(x1) = x1 + 5
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(|log'|#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(|1|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p2: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)
p3: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))
p4: +#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p5: +#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> +#(+(x,y),|1|(|#|()))
p6: +#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p7: +#(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> +#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            +#_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x1 - 10, x2 - 10}
            |0|_A(x1) = max{17, x1}
            +_A(x1,x2) = max{18, x1, x2}
            |1|_A(x1) = max{9, x1}
            |#|_A = 11
            +#!_A(x1,x2) = 0
            |0|!_A(x1) = 4
            +!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 9
            |1|!_A(x1) = 6
            |#|!_A = 4
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              +#_A(x1,x2) = 0
              |0|_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              +_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              |1|_A(x1) = x1 + 4
              |#|_A() = 2
              +#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              |0|!_A(x1) = 12
              +!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 18
              |1|!_A(x1) = 13
              |#|!_A() = 9
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(+#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(+) = [1, 2]
      pi(|1|) = []
      pi(|#|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2, p4, p5, p6, p7



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r13, r27

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            +#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 21, x2 - 28}
            +_A(x1,x2) = max{20, x1 + 7, x2}
            |0|_A(x1) = 8
            |#|_A = 8
            |1|_A(x1) = 0
            -_A(x1,x2) = 0
            |log'|_A(x1) = 13
            +#!_A(x1,x2) = max{19, x1 - 1, x2 - 28}
            +!_A(x1,x2) = 9
            |0|!_A(x1) = 8
            |#|!_A = 4
            |1|!_A(x1) = 7
            -!_A(x1,x2) = max{21, x1 - 13, x2 + 13}
            |log'|!_A(x1) = 6
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              +#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              +_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              |0|_A(x1) = 2
              |#|_A() = 1
              |1|_A(x1) = 6
              -_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 3
              |log'|_A(x1) = x1 + 1
              +#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 9
              +!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 9
              |0|!_A(x1) = 8
              |#|!_A() = 2
              |1|!_A(x1) = 6
              -!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
              |log'|!_A(x1) = 4
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(+#) = [1, 2]
      pi(+) = [1, 2]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(|#|) = []
      pi(|1|) = []
      pi(-) = [1, 2]
      pi(|log'|) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: -#(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> -#(x,y)
p2: -#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> -#(x,y)
p3: -#(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> -#(x,y)
p4: -#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> -#(x,y)
p5: -#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> -#(-(x,y),|1|(|#|()))

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            -#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            |0|_A(x1) = 31
            |1|_A(x1) = 14
            -_A(x1,x2) = max{32, x1 + 16}
            |#|_A = 19
            -#!_A(x1,x2) = 1
            |0|!_A(x1) = 42
            |1|!_A(x1) = 1
            -!_A(x1,x2) = 42
            |#|!_A = 0
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              -#_A(x1,x2) = 0
              |0|_A(x1) = x1 + 3
              |1|_A(x1) = x1 + 3
              -_A(x1,x2) = x1
              |#|_A() = 5
              -#!_A(x1,x2) = 1
              |0|!_A(x1) = x1 + 7
              |1|!_A(x1) = 1
              -!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
              |#|!_A() = 4
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(-#) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = [1]
      pi(|1|) = [1]
      pi(-) = [1]
      pi(|#|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2, p3, p4



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: -#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> -#(-(x,y),|1|(|#|()))

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: -#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> -#(-(x,y),|1|(|#|()))

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            -#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            |0|_A(x1) = x1 + 47
            |1|_A(x1) = x1 + 47
            -_A(x1,x2) = x1
            |#|_A = 2
            -#!_A(x1,x2) = max{31, x1 + 24, x2 - 22}
            |0|!_A(x1) = 23
            |1|!_A(x1) = x1 + 28
            -!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
            |#|!_A = 22
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              -#_A(x1,x2) = x1
              |0|_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              |1|_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              -_A(x1,x2) = x1
              |#|_A() = 2
              -#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 5
              |0|!_A(x1) = 4
              |1|!_A(x1) = 6
              -!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 8
              |#|!_A() = 1
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(-#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(|1|) = []
      pi(-) = [1, 2]
      pi(|#|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: ge#(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge#(x,y)
p2: ge#(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge#(x,y)
p3: ge#(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge#(x,y)
p4: ge#(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge#(y,x)

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            ge#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            |0|_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 35}
            |1|_A(x1) = x1 + 14
            ge#!_A(x1,x2) = 0
            |0|!_A(x1) = max{57, x1 + 42}
            |1|!_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 15}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              ge#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
              |0|_A(x1) = x1 + 2
              |1|_A(x1) = x1 + 3
              ge#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 6
              |0|!_A(x1) = 5
              |1|!_A(x1) = 5
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(ge#) = []
      pi(|0|) = [1]
      pi(|1|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2, p3, p4

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: ge#(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge#(|#|(),x)

and R consists of:

r1: |0|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r2: +(|#|(),x) -> x
r3: +(x,|#|()) -> x
r4: +(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(+(x,y))
r5: +(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r6: +(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(+(x,y))
r7: +(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(+(+(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r8: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r9: -(|#|(),x) -> |#|()
r10: -(x,|#|()) -> x
r11: -(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r12: -(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> |1|(-(-(x,y),|1|(|#|())))
r13: -(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> |1|(-(x,y))
r14: -(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> |0|(-(x,y))
r15: not(true()) -> false()
r16: not(false()) -> true()
r17: if(true(),x,y) -> x
r18: if(false(),x,y) -> y
r19: ge(|0|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r20: ge(|0|(x),|1|(y)) -> not(ge(y,x))
r21: ge(|1|(x),|0|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r22: ge(|1|(x),|1|(y)) -> ge(x,y)
r23: ge(x,|#|()) -> true()
r24: ge(|#|(),|0|(x)) -> ge(|#|(),x)
r25: ge(|#|(),|1|(x)) -> false()
r26: log(x) -> -(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r27: |log'|(|#|()) -> |#|()
r28: |log'|(|1|(x)) -> +(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|()))
r29: |log'|(|0|(x)) -> if(ge(x,|1|(|#|())),+(|log'|(x),|1|(|#|())),|#|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r9

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            ge#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            |#|_A = 103
            |0|_A(x1) = max{25, x1 - 36}
            -_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 19, x2 - 160}
            ge#!_A(x1,x2) = max{19, x1 - 84}
            |#|!_A = 4
            |0|!_A(x1) = x1 + 18
            -!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 20, x2 - 67}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
          
            carrier: N^1
            order: standard order
            interpretations:
              ge#_A(x1,x2) = x2
              |#|_A() = 19
              |0|_A(x1) = x1 + 13
              -_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
              ge#!_A(x1,x2) = 19
              |#|!_A() = 18
              |0|!_A(x1) = 21
              -!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(ge#) = [1, 2]
      pi(|#|) = []
      pi(|0|) = [1]
      pi(-) = [1, 2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.