YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  p(s(x)) -> x
  plus(x,|0|()) -> x
  plus(|0|(),y) -> y
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
  plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
  plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
  times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
  times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
  div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
  quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
  div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
  eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
  eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
  eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
  eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
  divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
  prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
  pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
  pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
  if(true(),x,y) -> false()
  if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)
p3: plus#(s(x),y) -> p#(s(x))
p4: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p5: plus#(x,s(y)) -> p#(s(y))
p6: times#(s(x),y) -> plus#(y,times(x,y))
p7: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)
p8: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p9: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p10: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p11: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(y,z))
p12: div#(div(x,y),z) -> times#(y,z)
p13: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)
p14: divides#(y,x) -> eq#(x,times(div(x,y),y))
p15: divides#(y,x) -> times#(div(x,y),y)
p16: divides#(y,x) -> div#(x,y)
p17: prime#(s(s(x))) -> pr#(s(s(x)),s(x))
p18: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
p19: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> divides#(s(s(y)),x)
p20: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p18, p20}
  {p8, p9, p10, p11}
  {p7}
  {p1, p2, p4}
  {p13}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if#(false(),x,y) -> pr#(x,y)
p2: pr#(x,s(s(y))) -> if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r12, r16, r17, r18, r19, r20

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{0, x1 - 46, x2 - 13, x3 - 49}
            false_A = 35
            pr#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 13, x2 - 59}
            s_A(x1) = max{37, x1 + 10}
            divides_A(x1,x2) = max{35, x2 - 1}
            quot_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 34, x2 - 41, x3 - 39}
            |0|_A = 39
            eq_A(x1,x2) = max{34, x1 - 1}
            true_A = 35
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{35, x1 - 38, x2 - 5}
            div_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 33, x2 - 48}
            if#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3 + 4
            false!_A = 2
            pr#!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x2 - 5}
            s!_A(x1) = 0
            divides!_A(x1,x2) = max{43, x1 - 21, x2}
            quot!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{1, x3 - 1}
            |0|!_A = 9
            eq!_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 38}
            true!_A = 3
            times!_A(x1,x2) = max{44, x1 - 34, x2}
            div!_A(x1,x2) = 8
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            if#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{74, x1 - 21, x3 + 1}
            false_A = 16
            pr#_A(x1,x2) = max{74, x2 - 11}
            s_A(x1) = max{72, x1 + 12}
            divides_A(x1,x2) = max{20, x1 - 1}
            quot_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 38, x3 - 71}
            |0|_A = 39
            eq_A(x1,x2) = 16
            true_A = 0
            times_A(x1,x2) = 13
            div_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 37
            if#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{12, x1 - 2, x3 + 1}
            false!_A = 12
            pr#!_A(x1,x2) = max{13, x2 - 2}
            s!_A(x1) = 17
            divides!_A(x1,x2) = max{14, x1 - 1}
            quot!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + 18
            |0|!_A = 58
            eq!_A(x1,x2) = max{19, x1 - 73}
            true!_A = 18
            times!_A(x1,x2) = max{58, x1 - 73, x2 + 56}
            div!_A(x1,x2) = 17
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(if#) = []
      pi(false) = []
      pi(pr#) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(divides) = [2]
      pi(quot) = [1, 2]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(eq) = []
      pi(true) = []
      pi(times) = []
      pi(div) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(div(x,y),z) -> div#(x,times(y,z))
p2: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p4: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r2

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = 1
            div_A(x1,x2) = 44
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{24, x1 - 18, x2 - 29}
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 1
            |0|_A = 25
            s_A(x1) = x1 + 23
            plus_A(x1,x2) = max{25, x1}
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = 17
            div!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 17
            times!_A(x1,x2) = 16
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 17
            |0|!_A = 14
            s!_A(x1) = 30
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 28
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = 1
            div_A(x1,x2) = 12
            times_A(x1,x2) = 14
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 1
            |0|_A = 14
            s_A(x1) = 9
            plus_A(x1,x2) = max{22, x1 + 13}
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = 4
            div!_A(x1,x2) = max{32, x1 + 20, x2 + 5}
            times!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x2 - 1}
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = 4
            |0|!_A = 33
            s!_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 11}
            plus!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 + 1}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = [1]
      pi(div) = [1, 2]
      pi(times) = [1]
      pi(quot#) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(plus) = [1, 2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p3: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 1, x2 - 36}
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 1, x2 - 36, x3 - 36}
            s_A(x1) = max{35, x1 + 14}
            |0|_A = 34
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x1 - 36, x2 - 36}
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{8, x1 - 36, x2 - 36, x3 - 36}
            s!_A(x1) = x1 + 7
            |0|!_A = 6
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 4, x2 - 15}
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{0, x1 - 4, x2 - 15, x3 - 15}
            s_A(x1) = max{14, x1 + 3}
            |0|_A = 11
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 115, x2 - 118}
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{7, x1 - 115, x2 - 118, x3 - 118}
            s!_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 114}
            |0|!_A = 5
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = [1]
      pi(quot#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p2



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 2, x2 - 46}
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{0, x1 - 2, x2 - 48, x3 - 46}
            |0|_A = 46
            s_A(x1) = max{45, x1 - 27}
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 116
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + 116
            |0|!_A = 113
            s!_A(x1) = max{115, x1 + 26}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            div#_A(x1,x2) = max{9, x1 - 1, x2 + 3}
            quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{9, x1 - 1, x2 - 12, x3 + 3}
            |0|_A = 11
            s_A(x1) = 5
            div#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 4
            quot#!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{2, x2 - 1}
            |0|!_A = 10
            s!_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 3}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = [1]
      pi(quot#) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: times#(s(x),y) -> times#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            times#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 7}
            s_A(x1) = max{15, x1 + 6}
            times#!_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 16, x2 - 1}
            s!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 120}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            times#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 5}
            s_A(x1) = max{12, x1 + 4}
            times#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 64, x2 - 1}
            s!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 63}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(times#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(x,y)
p2: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))
p3: plus#(s(x),y) -> plus#(p(s(x)),y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 13, x2 - 13}
            s_A(x1) = max{12, x1 + 6}
            p_A(x1) = max{9, x1 - 3}
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 10}
            s!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 82}
            p!_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 87}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 12, x2 - 12}
            s_A(x1) = max{10, x1 + 4}
            p_A(x1) = max{11, x1}
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 97, x2 - 78}
            s!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 85}
            p!_A(x1) = max{15, x1 - 89}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(p) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p3



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(x,s(y)) -> plus#(x,p(s(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r7

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 6, x2 - 28}
            s_A(x1) = max{27, x1 + 8}
            p_A(x1) = max{26, x1 - 4}
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{59, x1 - 34, x2 - 36}
            |0|_A = 1
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 6}
            s!_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 142}
            p!_A(x1) = max{22, x1 - 183}
            times!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 247, x2 - 146}
            |0|!_A = 0
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            plus#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 10, x2 - 30}
            s_A(x1) = max{21, x1 + 2}
            p_A(x1) = max{29, x1}
            times_A(x1,x2) = max{31, x1 - 23, x2 - 33}
            |0|_A = 4
            plus#!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 1, x2 - 24}
            s!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 110}
            p!_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 132}
            times!_A(x1,x2) = max{6, x1 - 109, x2 - 32}
            |0|!_A = 3
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(plus#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(p) = [1]
      pi(times) = []
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: eq#(s(x),s(y)) -> eq#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: p(s(x)) -> x
r2: plus(x,|0|()) -> x
r3: plus(|0|(),y) -> y
r4: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(x,y))
r5: plus(s(x),y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)),y))
r6: plus(x,s(y)) -> s(plus(x,p(s(y))))
r7: times(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r8: times(s(|0|()),y) -> y
r9: times(s(x),y) -> plus(y,times(x,y))
r10: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r11: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r12: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r13: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r14: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))
r15: div(div(x,y),z) -> div(x,times(y,z))
r16: eq(|0|(),|0|()) -> true()
r17: eq(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r18: eq(|0|(),s(y)) -> false()
r19: eq(s(x),s(y)) -> eq(x,y)
r20: divides(y,x) -> eq(x,times(div(x,y),y))
r21: prime(s(s(x))) -> pr(s(s(x)),s(x))
r22: pr(x,s(|0|())) -> true()
r23: pr(x,s(s(y))) -> if(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y))
r24: if(true(),x,y) -> false()
r25: if(false(),x,y) -> pr(x,y)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            eq#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 5, x2 - 5}
            s_A(x1) = max{14, x1 + 4}
            eq#!_A(x1,x2) = max{16, x1 - 15, x2 - 15}
            s!_A(x1) = max{15, x1 + 1}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            eq#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 5, x2 - 5}
            s_A(x1) = max{23, x1 + 4}
            eq#!_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 97, x2 - 97}
            s!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 96}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(eq#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.