YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  app(perfectp(),|0|()) -> false()
  app(perfectp(),app(s(),x)) -> app(app(app(app(f(),x),app(s(),|0|())),app(s(),x)),app(s(),x))
  app(app(app(app(f(),|0|()),y),|0|()),u) -> true()
  app(app(app(app(f(),|0|()),y),app(s(),z)),u) -> false()
  app(app(app(app(f(),app(s(),x)),|0|()),z),u) -> app(app(app(app(f(),x),u),app(app(minus(),z),app(s(),x))),u)
  app(app(app(app(f(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)),z),u) -> app(app(app(if(),app(app(le(),x),y)),app(app(app(app(f(),app(s(),x)),app(app(minus(),y),x)),z),u)),app(app(app(app(f(),x),u),z),u))
  app(app(map(),|fun|),nil()) -> nil()
  app(app(map(),|fun|),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(|fun|,x)),app(app(map(),|fun|),xs))
  app(app(filter(),|fun|),nil()) -> nil()
  app(app(filter(),|fun|),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(app(app(filter2(),app(|fun|,x)),|fun|),x),xs)
  app(app(app(app(filter2(),true()),|fun|),x),xs) -> app(app(cons(),x),app(app(filter(),|fun|),xs))
  app(app(app(app(filter2(),false()),|fun|),x),xs) -> app(app(filter(),|fun|),xs)

Instead we prove termination of the uncurried system:

  app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
  app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
  app(f_0(),y) -> f_1(y)
  app(f_1(x1),y) -> f_2(x1,y)
  app(f_2(x1,x2),y) -> f_3(x1,x2,y)
  app(f_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> f_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
  app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
  app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
  app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
  app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
  app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
  app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
  app(if_0(),y) -> if_1(y)
  app(if_1(x1),y) -> if_2(x1,y)
  app(if_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_3(x1,x2,y)
  app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y)
  app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y)
  app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
  app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
  app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
  app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
  app(perfectp_0(),y) -> perfectp_1(y)
  app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
  perfectp_1(|0|_0()) -> false_0()
  perfectp_1(s_1(x)) -> f_4(x,s_1(|0|_0()),s_1(x),s_1(x))
  f_4(|0|_0(),y,|0|_0(),u) -> true_0()
  f_4(|0|_0(),y,s_1(z),u) -> false_0()
  f_4(s_1(x),|0|_0(),z,u) -> f_4(x,u,minus_2(z,s_1(x)),u)
  f_4(s_1(x),s_1(y),z,u) -> if_3(le_2(x,y),f_4(s_1(x),minus_2(y,x),z,u),f_4(x,u,z,u))
  map_2(|fun|,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
  map_2(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(|fun|,x),map_2(|fun|,xs))
  filter_2(|fun|,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
  filter_2(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(|fun|,x),|fun|,x,xs)
  filter2_4(true_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(|fun|,xs))
  filter2_4(false_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> filter_2(|fun|,xs)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(f_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> f_4#(x1,x2,x3,y)
p2: app#(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2#(x1,y)
p3: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y)
p4: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p5: app#(perfectp_0(),y) -> perfectp_1#(y)
p6: perfectp_1#(s_1(x)) -> f_4#(x,s_1(|0|_0()),s_1(x),s_1(x))
p7: f_4#(s_1(x),|0|_0(),z,u) -> f_4#(x,u,minus_2(z,s_1(x)),u)
p8: f_4#(s_1(x),s_1(y),z,u) -> f_4#(s_1(x),minus_2(y,x),z,u)
p9: f_4#(s_1(x),s_1(y),z,u) -> f_4#(x,u,z,u)
p10: map_2#(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(|fun|,x)
p11: map_2#(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(|fun|,xs)
p12: filter_2#(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(|fun|,x),|fun|,x,xs)
p13: filter_2#(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(|fun|,x)
p14: filter2_4#(true_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> filter_2#(|fun|,xs)
p15: filter2_4#(false_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> filter_2#(|fun|,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(f_0(),y) -> f_1(y)
r4: app(f_1(x1),y) -> f_2(x1,y)
r5: app(f_2(x1,x2),y) -> f_3(x1,x2,y)
r6: app(f_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> f_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r7: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r8: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r10: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r11: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r12: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r13: app(if_0(),y) -> if_1(y)
r14: app(if_1(x1),y) -> if_2(x1,y)
r15: app(if_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_3(x1,x2,y)
r16: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y)
r17: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y)
r18: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r19: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r20: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r21: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r22: app(perfectp_0(),y) -> perfectp_1(y)
r23: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r24: perfectp_1(|0|_0()) -> false_0()
r25: perfectp_1(s_1(x)) -> f_4(x,s_1(|0|_0()),s_1(x),s_1(x))
r26: f_4(|0|_0(),y,|0|_0(),u) -> true_0()
r27: f_4(|0|_0(),y,s_1(z),u) -> false_0()
r28: f_4(s_1(x),|0|_0(),z,u) -> f_4(x,u,minus_2(z,s_1(x)),u)
r29: f_4(s_1(x),s_1(y),z,u) -> if_3(le_2(x,y),f_4(s_1(x),minus_2(y,x),z,u),f_4(x,u,z,u))
r30: map_2(|fun|,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r31: map_2(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(|fun|,x),map_2(|fun|,xs))
r32: filter_2(|fun|,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r33: filter_2(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(|fun|,x),|fun|,x,xs)
r34: filter2_4(true_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(|fun|,xs))
r35: filter2_4(false_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> filter_2(|fun|,xs)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2, p3, p4, p10, p11, p12, p13, p14, p15}
  {p7, p9}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: map_2#(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(|fun|,x)
p2: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p3: map_2#(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(|fun|,xs)
p4: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y)
p5: filter2_4#(false_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> filter_2#(|fun|,xs)
p6: filter_2#(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(|fun|,x)
p7: app#(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2#(x1,y)
p8: filter_2#(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(|fun|,x),|fun|,x,xs)
p9: filter2_4#(true_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> filter_2#(|fun|,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(f_0(),y) -> f_1(y)
r4: app(f_1(x1),y) -> f_2(x1,y)
r5: app(f_2(x1,x2),y) -> f_3(x1,x2,y)
r6: app(f_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> f_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r7: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r8: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r10: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r11: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r12: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r13: app(if_0(),y) -> if_1(y)
r14: app(if_1(x1),y) -> if_2(x1,y)
r15: app(if_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_3(x1,x2,y)
r16: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y)
r17: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y)
r18: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r19: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r20: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r21: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r22: app(perfectp_0(),y) -> perfectp_1(y)
r23: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r24: perfectp_1(|0|_0()) -> false_0()
r25: perfectp_1(s_1(x)) -> f_4(x,s_1(|0|_0()),s_1(x),s_1(x))
r26: f_4(|0|_0(),y,|0|_0(),u) -> true_0()
r27: f_4(|0|_0(),y,s_1(z),u) -> false_0()
r28: f_4(s_1(x),|0|_0(),z,u) -> f_4(x,u,minus_2(z,s_1(x)),u)
r29: f_4(s_1(x),s_1(y),z,u) -> if_3(le_2(x,y),f_4(s_1(x),minus_2(y,x),z,u),f_4(x,u,z,u))
r30: map_2(|fun|,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r31: map_2(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(|fun|,x),map_2(|fun|,xs))
r32: filter_2(|fun|,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r33: filter_2(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(|fun|,x),|fun|,x,xs)
r34: filter2_4(true_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(|fun|,xs))
r35: filter2_4(false_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> filter_2(|fun|,xs)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            map_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 10}
            cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{60, x1 + 58, x2 + 49}
            app#_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 82}
            map_1_A(x1) = max{82, x1 + 72}
            filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 81, x2 + 74}
            filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = max{3, x2 - 8}
            false_0_A = 19
            filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 8}
            filter_1_A(x1) = x1 + 96
            app_A(x1,x2) = max{19, x2 - 12}
            true_0_A = 17
            map_2#!_A(x1,x2) = max{88, x2 + 37}
            cons_2!_A(x1,x2) = max{86, x2 + 60}
            app#!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 94
            map_1!_A(x1) = max{56, x1 + 1}
            filter2_3!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{103, x2 + 89}
            filter2_4#!_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = x4 + 93
            false_0!_A = 93
            filter_2#!_A(x1,x2) = max{92, x2 + 45}
            filter_1!_A(x1) = x1
            app!_A(x1,x2) = max{104, x1 + 10, x2 + 57}
            true_0!_A = 91
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            map_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 216}
            cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{215, x1 + 52, x2 + 56}
            app#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 164}
            map_1_A(x1) = 53
            filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 + 2, x2 + 144, x3}
            filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = max{1, x4 - 164}
            false_0_A = 15
            filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 216}
            filter_1_A(x1) = 51
            app_A(x1,x2) = max{49, x1 - 52, x2 - 112}
            true_0_A = 13
            map_2#!_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 158, x2 + 60}
            cons_2!_A(x1,x2) = 155
            app#!_A(x1,x2) = max{156, x1 + 39, x2 + 59}
            map_1!_A(x1) = x1 + 159
            filter2_3!_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{2, x3 + 1}
            filter2_4#!_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = max{182, x2 + 94, x3 + 1, x4 + 58}
            false_0!_A = 179
            filter_2#!_A(x1,x2) = max{181, x1 + 93}
            filter_1!_A(x1) = 180
            app!_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 179
            true_0!_A = 173
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(map_2#) = []
      pi(cons_2) = []
      pi(app#) = []
      pi(map_1) = [1]
      pi(filter2_3) = [1, 3]
      pi(filter2_4#) = []
      pi(false_0) = []
      pi(filter_2#) = []
      pi(filter_1) = []
      pi(app) = [1, 2]
      pi(true_0) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, p9

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f_4#(s_1(x),|0|_0(),z,u) -> f_4#(x,u,minus_2(z,s_1(x)),u)
p2: f_4#(s_1(x),s_1(y),z,u) -> f_4#(x,u,z,u)

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(f_0(),y) -> f_1(y)
r4: app(f_1(x1),y) -> f_2(x1,y)
r5: app(f_2(x1,x2),y) -> f_3(x1,x2,y)
r6: app(f_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> f_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r7: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r8: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r10: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r11: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r12: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r13: app(if_0(),y) -> if_1(y)
r14: app(if_1(x1),y) -> if_2(x1,y)
r15: app(if_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_3(x1,x2,y)
r16: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y)
r17: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y)
r18: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r19: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r20: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r21: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r22: app(perfectp_0(),y) -> perfectp_1(y)
r23: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r24: perfectp_1(|0|_0()) -> false_0()
r25: perfectp_1(s_1(x)) -> f_4(x,s_1(|0|_0()),s_1(x),s_1(x))
r26: f_4(|0|_0(),y,|0|_0(),u) -> true_0()
r27: f_4(|0|_0(),y,s_1(z),u) -> false_0()
r28: f_4(s_1(x),|0|_0(),z,u) -> f_4(x,u,minus_2(z,s_1(x)),u)
r29: f_4(s_1(x),s_1(y),z,u) -> if_3(le_2(x,y),f_4(s_1(x),minus_2(y,x),z,u),f_4(x,u,z,u))
r30: map_2(|fun|,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r31: map_2(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(|fun|,x),map_2(|fun|,xs))
r32: filter_2(|fun|,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r33: filter_2(|fun|,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(|fun|,x),|fun|,x,xs)
r34: filter2_4(true_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(|fun|,xs))
r35: filter2_4(false_0(),|fun|,x,xs) -> filter_2(|fun|,xs)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            f_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = max{0, x1 - 11, x2 - 13, x3 - 8, x4 - 12}
            s_1_A(x1) = x1
            |0|_0_A = 1
            minus_2_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 3, x2 - 3}
            f_4#!_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = x1 + 1
            s_1!_A(x1) = max{10, x1 + 2}
            |0|_0!_A = 9
            minus_2!_A(x1,x2) = max{11, x1 + 3, x2 + 8}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            f_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = 0
            s_1_A(x1) = x1
            |0|_0_A = 0
            minus_2_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 12, x2 + 12}
            f_4#!_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = max{9, x1 - 73, x2 - 74, x4 - 73}
            s_1!_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 2}
            |0|_0!_A = 8
            minus_2!_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x1 - 1, x2 - 72}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(f_4#) = [1]
      pi(s_1) = [1]
      pi(|0|_0) = []
      pi(minus_2) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.