YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  xor(x,F()) -> x
  xor(x,neg(x)) -> F()
  and(x,T()) -> x
  and(x,F()) -> F()
  and(x,x) -> x
  and(xor(x,y),z) -> xor(and(x,z),and(y,z))
  xor(x,x) -> F()
  impl(x,y) -> xor(and(x,y),xor(x,T()))
  or(x,y) -> xor(and(x,y),xor(x,y))
  equiv(x,y) -> xor(x,xor(y,T()))
  neg(x) -> xor(x,T())


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: and#(xor(x,y),z) -> xor#(and(x,z),and(y,z))
p2: and#(xor(x,y),z) -> and#(x,z)
p3: and#(xor(x,y),z) -> and#(y,z)
p4: impl#(x,y) -> xor#(and(x,y),xor(x,T()))
p5: impl#(x,y) -> and#(x,y)
p6: impl#(x,y) -> xor#(x,T())
p7: or#(x,y) -> xor#(and(x,y),xor(x,y))
p8: or#(x,y) -> and#(x,y)
p9: or#(x,y) -> xor#(x,y)
p10: equiv#(x,y) -> xor#(x,xor(y,T()))
p11: equiv#(x,y) -> xor#(y,T())
p12: neg#(x) -> xor#(x,T())

and R consists of:

r1: xor(x,F()) -> x
r2: xor(x,neg(x)) -> F()
r3: and(x,T()) -> x
r4: and(x,F()) -> F()
r5: and(x,x) -> x
r6: and(xor(x,y),z) -> xor(and(x,z),and(y,z))
r7: xor(x,x) -> F()
r8: impl(x,y) -> xor(and(x,y),xor(x,T()))
r9: or(x,y) -> xor(and(x,y),xor(x,y))
r10: equiv(x,y) -> xor(x,xor(y,T()))
r11: neg(x) -> xor(x,T())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: and#(xor(x,y),z) -> and#(x,z)
p2: and#(xor(x,y),z) -> and#(y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: xor(x,F()) -> x
r2: xor(x,neg(x)) -> F()
r3: and(x,T()) -> x
r4: and(x,F()) -> F()
r5: and(x,x) -> x
r6: and(xor(x,y),z) -> xor(and(x,z),and(y,z))
r7: xor(x,x) -> F()
r8: impl(x,y) -> xor(and(x,y),xor(x,T()))
r9: or(x,y) -> xor(and(x,y),xor(x,y))
r10: equiv(x,y) -> xor(x,xor(y,T()))
r11: neg(x) -> xor(x,T())

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            and#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            xor_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 3, x2 - 3}
            and#!_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 16}
            xor!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 8, x2 - 15}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            and#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            xor_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 4, x2 - 4}
            and#!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 2, x2 - 1}
            xor!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 9}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(and#) = [1]
      pi(xor) = [1, 2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.