YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  +(x,|0|()) -> x
  +(|0|(),x) -> x
  +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
  +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
  *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
  *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
  *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
  *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
  sum(nil()) -> |0|()
  sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
  prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
  prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p2: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))
p3: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)
p4: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(*(x,y),+(x,y))
p5: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> *#(x,y)
p6: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p7: *#(*(x,y),z) -> *#(x,*(y,z))
p8: *#(*(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)
p9: sum#(cons(x,l)) -> +#(x,sum(l))
p10: sum#(cons(x,l)) -> sum#(l)
p11: prod#(cons(x,l)) -> *#(x,prod(l))
p12: prod#(cons(x,l)) -> prod#(l)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r5: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r7: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r8: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
r9: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r10: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r11: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r12: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p10}
  {p12}
  {p5, p7, p8}
  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: sum#(cons(x,l)) -> sum#(l)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r5: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r7: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r8: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
r9: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r10: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r11: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r12: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            sum#_A(x1) = x1
            cons_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 90, x2 + 17}
            sum#!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 214}
            cons!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 76, x2 - 213}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            sum#_A(x1) = x1
            cons_A(x1,x2) = max{6, x1 - 42, x2 + 1}
            sum#!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 8}
            cons!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 51, x2 - 8}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(sum#) = [1]
      pi(cons) = [2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: prod#(cons(x,l)) -> prod#(l)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r5: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r7: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r8: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
r9: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r10: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r11: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r12: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            prod#_A(x1) = x1
            cons_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2 + 1}
            prod#!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 50}
            cons!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 11, x2 - 49}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            prod#_A(x1) = x1
            cons_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 33, x2 + 30}
            prod#!_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 31}
            cons!_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 18, x2 - 1}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(prod#) = []
      pi(cons) = [2]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(*(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)
p2: *#(*(x,y),z) -> *#(x,*(y,z))
p3: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> *#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r5: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r7: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r8: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
r9: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r10: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r11: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r12: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            *#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 11, x2 - 12}
            *_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x1 + 1, x2}
            s_A(x1) = max{6, x1}
            +_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x1, x2}
            |0|_A = 11
            *#!_A(x1,x2) = 1
            *!_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 12, x2 - 15}
            s!_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 37}
            +!_A(x1,x2) = max{6, x1 - 26, x2 - 32}
            |0|!_A = 4
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            *#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 9, x2 - 10}
            *_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x1 + 1, x2}
            s_A(x1) = max{2, x1}
            +_A(x1,x2) = max{6, x1, x2}
            |0|_A = 9
            *#!_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 2
            *!_A(x1,x2) = max{13, x1 + 6, x2 + 4}
            s!_A(x1) = max{10, x1 + 3}
            +!_A(x1,x2) = max{14, x1 - 9, x2 - 9}
            |0|!_A = 8
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(*#) = []
      pi(*) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(+) = [1, 2]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p2



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(*(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)
p2: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> *#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r5: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r7: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r8: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
r9: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r10: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r11: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r12: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(*(x,y),z) -> *#(y,z)
p2: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> *#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r5: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r7: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r8: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
r9: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r10: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r11: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r12: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            *#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            *_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 21, x2 - 17}
            s_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 3}
            *#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 53}
            *!_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 3, x2 - 22}
            s!_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 52}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            *#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            *_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 28, x2 - 23}
            s_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 4}
            *#!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 4, x2 - 4}
            *!_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 14, x2 - 9}
            s!_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 5}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(*#) = [1]
      pi(*) = [1, 2]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1, p2

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p2: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(y,z)
p3: +#(+(x,y),z) -> +#(x,+(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r5: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r7: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r8: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
r9: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r10: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r11: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r12: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            +#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 35, x2 - 46}
            s_A(x1) = max{16, x1}
            +_A(x1,x2) = max{34, x1 + 11, x2}
            |0|_A = 16
            +#!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 70, x2 - 81}
            s!_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 54}
            +!_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 35, x2 - 46}
            |0|!_A = 0
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            +#_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 19, x2 - 23}
            s_A(x1) = max{8, x1}
            +_A(x1,x2) = max{18, x1 + 4, x2}
            |0|_A = 8
            +#!_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 20, x2 - 33}
            s!_A(x1) = max{5, x1 - 31}
            +!_A(x1,x2) = max{6, x1 - 19, x2 - 32}
            |0|!_A = 3
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(+#) = [1]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(+) = [1, 2]
      pi(|0|) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p2, p3



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r5: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r7: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r8: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
r9: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r10: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r11: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r12: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: +(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
r5: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r6: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r7: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r8: *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
r9: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r10: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r11: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r12: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >G)
  
    base order 1:
  
      trivial reduction triple (T x T, T x T, Φ)
  
    base order 2:
  
      lexicographic combination of reduction triples:
      
        1. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            +#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 3}
            +#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x2 - 5}
            s!_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 4}
        
        2. marked-algebra reduction triple (>=A, >=A!, >A!):
        
          max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
          
            +#_A(x1,x2) = 0
            s_A(x1) = max{5, x1 - 6}
            +#!_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 6, x2 - 6}
            s!_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 55}
        
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(+#) = [2]
      pi(s) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.