YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  g(x,y) -> x
  g(x,y) -> y
  f(|0|(),|1|(),x) -> f(s(x),x,x)
  f(x,y,s(z)) -> s(f(|0|(),|1|(),z))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(|0|(),|1|(),x) -> f#(s(x),x,x)
p2: f#(x,y,s(z)) -> f#(|0|(),|1|(),z)

and R consists of:

r1: g(x,y) -> x
r2: g(x,y) -> y
r3: f(|0|(),|1|(),x) -> f(s(x),x,x)
r4: f(x,y,s(z)) -> s(f(|0|(),|1|(),z))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(|0|(),|1|(),x) -> f#(s(x),x,x)
p2: f#(x,y,s(z)) -> f#(|0|(),|1|(),z)

and R consists of:

r1: g(x,y) -> x
r2: g(x,y) -> y
r3: f(|0|(),|1|(),x) -> f(s(x),x,x)
r4: f(x,y,s(z)) -> s(f(|0|(),|1|(),z))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          f#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3 + 2
          |0|_A() = 4
          |1|_A() = 6
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 3
          g_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        |1| > f# = |0| = s = g
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(f#) = [3]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(|1|) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(g) = [1, 2]

The following rules are removed:

  p2



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(|0|(),|1|(),x) -> f#(s(x),x,x)

and R consists of:

r1: g(x,y) -> x
r2: g(x,y) -> y
r3: f(|0|(),|1|(),x) -> f(s(x),x,x)
r4: f(x,y,s(z)) -> s(f(|0|(),|1|(),z))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  (no SCCs)