YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
  quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p3: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          div#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 5
          quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + 5
          |0|_A() = 1
          s_A(x1) = x1 + 4
          div_A(x1,x2) = 3
          quot_A(x1,x2,x3) = x3 + 2
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        div# = quot# = s > div > quot > |0|
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(quot#) = []
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(div) = []
      pi(quot) = [3]

The following rules are removed:

  p3



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r3, r4, r5

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          div#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
          quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2
          |0|_A() = 2
          s_A(x1) = 0
          quot_A(x1,x2,x3) = 3
          div_A(x1,x2) = 0
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        quot# > div# = |0| = s > div > quot
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div#) = []
      pi(quot#) = [1]
      pi(|0|) = []
      pi(s) = []
      pi(quot) = []
      pi(div) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  (no SCCs)