YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
  app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))
  app(app(minus(),x),|0|()) -> x
  app(app(minus(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(minus(),app(p(),app(s(),x))),app(p(),app(s(),y)))
  app(p(),app(s(),x)) -> x
  app(app(div(),|0|()),app(s(),y)) -> |0|()
  app(app(div(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(s(),app(app(div(),app(app(minus(),x),app(id(),y))),app(s(),y)))
  app(id(),x) -> x
  app(id(),x) -> app(s(),app(s(),app(s(),x)))
  app(id(),app(p(),x)) -> app(id(),app(s(),app(id(),x)))

Instead we prove termination of the uncurried system:

  app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
  app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
  app(div_0(),y) -> div_1(y)
  app(div_1(x1),y) -> div_2(x1,y)
  app(id_0(),y) -> id_1(y)
  app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
  app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
  app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
  app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
  app(p_0(),y) -> p_1(y)
  app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
  map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
  map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
  minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x
  minus_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))
  p_1(s_1(x)) -> x
  div_2(|0|_0(),s_1(y)) -> |0|_0()
  div_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> s_1(div_2(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y)))
  id_1(x) -> x
  id_1(x) -> s_1(s_1(s_1(x)))
  id_1(p_1(x)) -> id_1(s_1(id_1(x)))


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(div_1(x1),y) -> div_2#(x1,y)
p2: app#(id_0(),y) -> id_1#(y)
p3: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p4: app#(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2#(x1,y)
p5: app#(p_0(),y) -> p_1#(y)
p6: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p7: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)
p8: minus_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2#(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))
p9: minus_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> p_1#(s_1(x))
p10: minus_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> p_1#(s_1(y))
p11: div_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> div_2#(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y))
p12: div_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2#(x,id_1(y))
p13: div_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> id_1#(y)
p14: id_1#(p_1(x)) -> id_1#(s_1(id_1(x)))
p15: id_1#(p_1(x)) -> id_1#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(div_0(),y) -> div_1(y)
r4: app(div_1(x1),y) -> div_2(x1,y)
r5: app(id_0(),y) -> id_1(y)
r6: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r7: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r8: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r9: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r10: app(p_0(),y) -> p_1(y)
r11: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r12: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r13: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r14: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x
r15: minus_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))
r16: p_1(s_1(x)) -> x
r17: div_2(|0|_0(),s_1(y)) -> |0|_0()
r18: div_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> s_1(div_2(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y)))
r19: id_1(x) -> x
r20: id_1(x) -> s_1(s_1(s_1(x)))
r21: id_1(p_1(x)) -> id_1(s_1(id_1(x)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p3, p6, p7}
  {p11}
  {p15}
  {p8}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p2: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p3: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(div_0(),y) -> div_1(y)
r4: app(div_1(x1),y) -> div_2(x1,y)
r5: app(id_0(),y) -> id_1(y)
r6: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r7: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r8: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r9: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r10: app(p_0(),y) -> p_1(y)
r11: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r12: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r13: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r14: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x
r15: minus_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))
r16: p_1(s_1(x)) -> x
r17: div_2(|0|_0(),s_1(y)) -> |0|_0()
r18: div_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> s_1(div_2(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y)))
r19: id_1(x) -> x
r20: id_1(x) -> s_1(s_1(s_1(x)))
r21: id_1(p_1(x)) -> id_1(s_1(id_1(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r6, r8, r11, r14, r17, r18, r20

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          map_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 13
          cons_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 12
          app#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 11
          map_1_A(x1) = x1 + 3
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 11
          cons_0_A() = 2
          cons_1_A(x1) = 1
          div_0_A() = 2
          div_1_A(x1) = 1
          map_0_A() = 1
          minus_0_A() = 2
          minus_1_A(x1) = 1
          s_0_A() = 3
          s_1_A(x1) = 2
          minus_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
          |0|_0_A() = 1
          div_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
          id_1_A(x1) = 3
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        app# > map_2# > cons_2 = cons_0 = div_2 > app = cons_1 = div_0 = s_0 = |0|_0 > map_1 = div_1 = minus_0 = s_1 > map_0 > minus_2 = id_1 > minus_1
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(map_2#) = []
      pi(cons_2) = [1, 2]
      pi(app#) = [2]
      pi(map_1) = [1]
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = []
      pi(div_0) = []
      pi(div_1) = []
      pi(map_0) = []
      pi(minus_0) = []
      pi(minus_1) = []
      pi(s_0) = []
      pi(s_1) = []
      pi(minus_2) = []
      pi(|0|_0) = []
      pi(div_2) = [1, 2]
      pi(id_1) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p2: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(div_0(),y) -> div_1(y)
r4: app(div_1(x1),y) -> div_2(x1,y)
r5: app(id_0(),y) -> id_1(y)
r6: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r7: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r8: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r9: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r10: app(p_0(),y) -> p_1(y)
r11: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r12: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r13: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r14: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x
r15: minus_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))
r16: p_1(s_1(x)) -> x
r17: div_2(|0|_0(),s_1(y)) -> |0|_0()
r18: div_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> s_1(div_2(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y)))
r19: id_1(x) -> x
r20: id_1(x) -> s_1(s_1(s_1(x)))
r21: id_1(p_1(x)) -> id_1(s_1(id_1(x)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(div_0(),y) -> div_1(y)
r4: app(div_1(x1),y) -> div_2(x1,y)
r5: app(id_0(),y) -> id_1(y)
r6: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r7: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r8: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r9: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r10: app(p_0(),y) -> p_1(y)
r11: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r12: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r13: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r14: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x
r15: minus_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))
r16: p_1(s_1(x)) -> x
r17: div_2(|0|_0(),s_1(y)) -> |0|_0()
r18: div_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> s_1(div_2(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y)))
r19: id_1(x) -> x
r20: id_1(x) -> s_1(s_1(s_1(x)))
r21: id_1(p_1(x)) -> id_1(s_1(id_1(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r3, r6, r8, r11, r17, r18, r20

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          map_2#_A(x1,x2) = x2
          cons_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 10
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 9
          div_0_A() = 2
          div_1_A(x1) = 1
          map_0_A() = 3
          map_1_A(x1) = 2
          minus_0_A() = 4
          minus_1_A(x1) = 3
          s_0_A() = 6
          s_1_A(x1) = 5
          div_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 2
          |0|_0_A() = 1
          minus_2_A(x1,x2) = 2
          id_1_A(x1) = 8
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        cons_2 = id_1 > map_2# = div_2 > app = div_0 = minus_0 = s_0 > div_1 = map_0 = minus_1 = s_1 > map_1 = |0|_0 = minus_2
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(map_2#) = [2]
      pi(cons_2) = []
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(div_0) = []
      pi(div_1) = []
      pi(map_0) = []
      pi(map_1) = []
      pi(minus_0) = []
      pi(minus_1) = []
      pi(s_0) = []
      pi(s_1) = []
      pi(div_2) = [1]
      pi(|0|_0) = []
      pi(minus_2) = []
      pi(id_1) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> div_2#(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y))

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(div_0(),y) -> div_1(y)
r4: app(div_1(x1),y) -> div_2(x1,y)
r5: app(id_0(),y) -> id_1(y)
r6: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r7: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r8: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r9: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r10: app(p_0(),y) -> p_1(y)
r11: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r12: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r13: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r14: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x
r15: minus_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))
r16: p_1(s_1(x)) -> x
r17: div_2(|0|_0(),s_1(y)) -> |0|_0()
r18: div_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> s_1(div_2(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y)))
r19: id_1(x) -> x
r20: id_1(x) -> s_1(s_1(s_1(x)))
r21: id_1(p_1(x)) -> id_1(s_1(id_1(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r6, r8, r10, r11, r14, r15, r16

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          div_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
          s_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          minus_2_A(x1,x2) = x1
          id_1_A(x1) = 1
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 4
          cons_0_A() = 2
          cons_1_A(x1) = 1
          div_0_A() = 2
          div_1_A(x1) = 1
          map_0_A() = 2
          map_1_A(x1) = 1
          minus_0_A() = 2
          minus_1_A(x1) = 1
          p_0_A() = 1
          p_1_A(x1) = x1
          s_0_A() = 1
          |0|_0_A() = 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        minus_0 > minus_1 > app = map_0 > s_1 = cons_0 = div_0 = map_1 > id_1 = cons_1 = div_1 = s_0 = |0|_0 > minus_2 = p_1 > div_2# = p_0
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(div_2#) = [1]
      pi(s_1) = []
      pi(minus_2) = [1]
      pi(id_1) = []
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = []
      pi(div_0) = []
      pi(div_1) = []
      pi(map_0) = []
      pi(map_1) = []
      pi(minus_0) = []
      pi(minus_1) = []
      pi(p_0) = []
      pi(p_1) = []
      pi(s_0) = []
      pi(|0|_0) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: id_1#(p_1(x)) -> id_1#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(div_0(),y) -> div_1(y)
r4: app(div_1(x1),y) -> div_2(x1,y)
r5: app(id_0(),y) -> id_1(y)
r6: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r7: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r8: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r9: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r10: app(p_0(),y) -> p_1(y)
r11: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r12: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r13: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r14: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x
r15: minus_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))
r16: p_1(s_1(x)) -> x
r17: div_2(|0|_0(),s_1(y)) -> |0|_0()
r18: div_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> s_1(div_2(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y)))
r19: id_1(x) -> x
r20: id_1(x) -> s_1(s_1(s_1(x)))
r21: id_1(p_1(x)) -> id_1(s_1(id_1(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r6, r8, r11, r14, r17, r18, r20

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          id_1#_A(x1) = x1
          p_1_A(x1) = x1 + 8
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 9
          cons_0_A() = 2
          cons_1_A(x1) = 1
          div_0_A() = 2
          div_1_A(x1) = 1
          map_0_A() = 9
          map_1_A(x1) = 8
          minus_0_A() = 2
          minus_1_A(x1) = 1
          s_0_A() = 3
          s_1_A(x1) = 2
          minus_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7
          |0|_0_A() = 1
          div_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
          id_1_A(x1) = 3
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        app = cons_0 = map_0 = s_0 > cons_1 = div_0 = map_1 = minus_0 = s_1 = minus_2 = div_2 > p_1 = div_1 = minus_1 = |0|_0 > id_1# = id_1
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(id_1#) = [1]
      pi(p_1) = []
      pi(app) = []
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = []
      pi(div_0) = []
      pi(div_1) = []
      pi(map_0) = []
      pi(map_1) = []
      pi(minus_0) = []
      pi(minus_1) = []
      pi(s_0) = []
      pi(s_1) = []
      pi(minus_2) = [1]
      pi(|0|_0) = []
      pi(div_2) = [2]
      pi(id_1) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: minus_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2#(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))

and R consists of:

r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r3: app(div_0(),y) -> div_1(y)
r4: app(div_1(x1),y) -> div_2(x1,y)
r5: app(id_0(),y) -> id_1(y)
r6: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r7: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r8: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y)
r9: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y)
r10: app(p_0(),y) -> p_1(y)
r11: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y)
r12: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r13: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r14: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x
r15: minus_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2(p_1(s_1(x)),p_1(s_1(y)))
r16: p_1(s_1(x)) -> x
r17: div_2(|0|_0(),s_1(y)) -> |0|_0()
r18: div_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> s_1(div_2(minus_2(x,id_1(y)),s_1(y)))
r19: id_1(x) -> x
r20: id_1(x) -> s_1(s_1(s_1(x)))
r21: id_1(p_1(x)) -> id_1(s_1(id_1(x)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r6, r8, r10, r11, r14, r15, r16, r17

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          minus_2#_A(x1,x2) = x2
          s_1_A(x1) = x1 + 4
          p_1_A(x1) = x1
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 5
          cons_0_A() = 5
          cons_1_A(x1) = 4
          div_0_A() = 1
          div_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          map_0_A() = 2
          map_1_A(x1) = 1
          minus_0_A() = 2
          minus_1_A(x1) = 1
          p_0_A() = 1
          s_0_A() = 1
          minus_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 2
          |0|_0_A() = 1
          div_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        div_1 > div_2 > minus_0 = minus_2 > app = cons_0 = map_0 = minus_1 > s_1 = cons_1 = div_0 = map_1 > s_0 = |0|_0 > minus_2# = p_1 > p_0
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(minus_2#) = [2]
      pi(s_1) = [1]
      pi(p_1) = []
      pi(app) = []
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = []
      pi(div_0) = []
      pi(div_1) = [1]
      pi(map_0) = []
      pi(map_1) = []
      pi(minus_0) = []
      pi(minus_1) = []
      pi(p_0) = []
      pi(s_0) = []
      pi(minus_2) = []
      pi(|0|_0) = []
      pi(div_2) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.