YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  app(app(.(),|1|()),x) -> x
  app(app(.(),x),|1|()) -> x
  app(app(.(),app(i(),x)),x) -> |1|()
  app(app(.(),x),app(i(),x)) -> |1|()
  app(app(.(),app(i(),y)),app(app(.(),y),z)) -> z
  app(app(.(),y),app(app(.(),app(i(),y)),z)) -> z
  app(i(),|1|()) -> |1|()
  app(i(),app(i(),x)) -> x
  app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
  app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))
  app(app(filter(),f),nil()) -> nil()
  app(app(filter(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(app(app(filter2(),app(f,x)),f),x),xs)
  app(app(app(app(filter2(),true()),f),x),xs) -> app(app(cons(),x),app(app(filter(),f),xs))
  app(app(app(app(filter2(),false()),f),x),xs) -> app(app(filter(),f),xs)

Instead we prove termination of the uncurried system:

  app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
  app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
  app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
  app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
  app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
  app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
  app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
  app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
  app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
  app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
  app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
  app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
  app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
  ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
  ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
  ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
  ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
  ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
  ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
  i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
  i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
  map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
  map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
  filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
  filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
  filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
  filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(._1(x1),y) -> ._2#(x1,y)
p2: app#(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2#(x1,y)
p3: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y)
p4: app#(i_0(),y) -> i_1#(y)
p5: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p6: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p7: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)
p8: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
p9: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p10: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)
p11: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2, p3, p5, p6, p7, p8, p9, p10, p11}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2#(x1,y)
p2: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p3: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p4: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)
p5: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p6: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y)
p7: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)
p8: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
p9: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r4, r5, r7, r8, r9, r16, r17, r20, r24

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          app#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 7
          filter_1_A(x1) = x1 + 7
          filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 8
          cons_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 6
          map_1_A(x1) = x1 + 9
          map_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 10
          filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2 + x3 + 4
          filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = x2 + x4 + 9
          false_0_A() = 1
          app_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 7
          true_0_A() = 1
          ._0_A() = 1
          ._1_A(x1) = x1 + 3
          cons_0_A() = 1
          cons_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter_0_A() = 1
          filter2_0_A() = 1
          filter2_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
          ._2_A(x1,x2) = 2
          i_1_A(x1) = 2
          |1|_0_A() = 1
          filter_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 6
          nil_0_A() = 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        filter_2# = map_2# > app# = map_1 = ._1 = i_1 > filter2_4# = app = ._0 > cons_2 = ._2 > cons_1 = |1|_0 > filter2_3 = cons_0 = filter_2 > filter_1 = false_0 = true_0 = filter2_2 = nil_0 > filter_0 = filter2_1 > filter2_0
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(app#) = []
      pi(filter_1) = [1]
      pi(filter_2#) = [1]
      pi(cons_2) = []
      pi(map_1) = []
      pi(map_2#) = []
      pi(filter2_3) = [3]
      pi(filter2_4#) = []
      pi(false_0) = []
      pi(app) = []
      pi(true_0) = []
      pi(._0) = []
      pi(._1) = [1]
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = [1]
      pi(filter_0) = []
      pi(filter2_0) = []
      pi(filter2_1) = [1]
      pi(filter2_2) = [1, 2]
      pi(._2) = []
      pi(i_1) = []
      pi(|1|_0) = []
      pi(filter_2) = [1]
      pi(nil_0) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p2: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p3: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)
p4: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p5: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y)
p6: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)
p7: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
p8: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p2: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y)
p3: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)
p4: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
p5: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)
p6: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p7: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p8: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r4, r5, r7, r8, r9, r16, r17, r20, r24

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
          cons_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 6
          app#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 7
          filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2 + x3 + 4
          filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = x2 + x4 + 5
          true_0_A() = 1
          app_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 7
          false_0_A() = 1
          map_1_A(x1) = x1 + 9
          map_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 10
          ._0_A() = 4
          ._1_A(x1) = x1 + 3
          cons_0_A() = 1
          cons_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter_0_A() = 1
          filter_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter2_0_A() = 1
          filter2_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
          ._2_A(x1,x2) = 2
          i_1_A(x1) = 2
          |1|_0_A() = 1
          filter_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
          nil_0_A() = 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        map_2# > app# > filter2_4# > filter_2# = filter2_3 = ._1 > app = ._0 = filter_2 > cons_2 = false_0 = map_1 = filter_1 = filter2_2 = ._2 = i_1 = nil_0 > true_0 = cons_1 = filter_0 = filter2_1 = |1|_0 > cons_0 = filter2_0
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(filter_2#) = []
      pi(cons_2) = [1]
      pi(app#) = []
      pi(filter2_3) = [2, 3]
      pi(filter2_4#) = [2]
      pi(true_0) = []
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(false_0) = []
      pi(map_1) = [1]
      pi(map_2#) = []
      pi(._0) = []
      pi(._1) = [1]
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = [1]
      pi(filter_0) = []
      pi(filter_1) = [1]
      pi(filter2_0) = []
      pi(filter2_1) = [1]
      pi(filter2_2) = [2]
      pi(._2) = []
      pi(i_1) = []
      pi(|1|_0) = []
      pi(filter_2) = [2]
      pi(nil_0) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y)
p2: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)
p3: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
p4: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)
p5: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p6: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p7: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p5, p6, p7}
  {p2, p3, p4}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p2: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p3: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r5, r7, r8, r9, r12, r16, r17, r20, r24

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          map_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
          cons_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 5
          app#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 6
          map_1_A(x1) = x1 + 3
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 4
          ._0_A() = 4
          ._1_A(x1) = 3
          cons_0_A() = 1
          cons_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter_0_A() = 2
          filter_1_A(x1) = 1
          filter2_0_A() = 4
          filter2_1_A(x1) = 3
          filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = 2
          filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = 1
          map_0_A() = 1
          ._2_A(x1,x2) = 2
          i_1_A(x1) = 2
          |1|_0_A() = 1
          filter_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 5
          nil_0_A() = 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        cons_2 > map_1 = app = ._0 = filter2_0 > map_2# = ._1 = cons_1 = filter_0 = filter2_1 = map_0 = i_1 = filter_2 > app# = cons_0 = filter_1 = filter2_2 = ._2 = nil_0 > filter2_3 = |1|_0
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(map_2#) = []
      pi(cons_2) = [1]
      pi(app#) = []
      pi(map_1) = [1]
      pi(app) = []
      pi(._0) = []
      pi(._1) = []
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = [1]
      pi(filter_0) = []
      pi(filter_1) = []
      pi(filter2_0) = []
      pi(filter2_1) = []
      pi(filter2_2) = []
      pi(filter2_3) = []
      pi(map_0) = []
      pi(._2) = []
      pi(i_1) = []
      pi(|1|_0) = []
      pi(filter_2) = [1]
      pi(nil_0) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y)
p2: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r5, r7, r8, r9, r12, r16, r17, r20, r22, r23, r24

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          map_2#_A(x1,x2) = x2
          cons_2_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
          app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 6
          ._0_A() = 4
          ._1_A(x1) = 3
          cons_0_A() = 2
          cons_1_A(x1) = 1
          filter_0_A() = 6
          filter_1_A(x1) = 5
          filter2_0_A() = 4
          filter2_1_A(x1) = 3
          filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = 2
          filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = 1
          map_0_A() = 2
          map_1_A(x1) = 1
          ._2_A(x1,x2) = 2
          i_1_A(x1) = 2
          |1|_0_A() = 1
          map_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
          nil_0_A() = 0
          filter_2_A(x1,x2) = 7
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        map_0 = nil_0 = filter_2 > map_1 > cons_2 = ._0 = map_2 > map_2# = app = ._1 = cons_0 = filter_0 = filter2_0 > cons_1 = filter_1 = filter2_1 = i_1 > filter2_2 = ._2 = |1|_0 > filter2_3
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(map_2#) = []
      pi(cons_2) = []
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(._0) = []
      pi(._1) = []
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = []
      pi(filter_0) = []
      pi(filter_1) = []
      pi(filter2_0) = []
      pi(filter2_1) = []
      pi(filter2_2) = []
      pi(filter2_3) = []
      pi(map_0) = []
      pi(map_1) = []
      pi(._2) = []
      pi(i_1) = []
      pi(|1|_0) = []
      pi(map_2) = [1, 2]
      pi(nil_0) = []
      pi(filter_2) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)
p2: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
p3: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r5, r7, r8, r9, r16, r17, r20, r24

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = x4 + 5
          true_0_A() = 1
          filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
          cons_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
          app_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
          false_0_A() = 1
          ._0_A() = 2
          ._1_A(x1) = x1 + 3
          cons_0_A() = 2
          cons_1_A(x1) = 1
          filter_0_A() = 1
          filter_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter2_0_A() = 1
          filter2_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
          filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2 + x3 + 4
          ._2_A(x1,x2) = 2
          i_1_A(x1) = 2
          |1|_0_A() = 1
          filter_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 3
          nil_0_A() = 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        filter2_4# > cons_2 > filter_2# = filter_2 > true_0 = app = false_0 = cons_0 > ._1 = cons_1 = filter_1 = filter2_3 = i_1 > ._0 = filter_0 = filter2_2 = ._2 = nil_0 > filter2_1 = |1|_0 > filter2_0
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(filter2_4#) = []
      pi(true_0) = []
      pi(filter_2#) = []
      pi(cons_2) = []
      pi(app) = [2]
      pi(false_0) = []
      pi(._0) = []
      pi(._1) = [1]
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = []
      pi(filter_0) = []
      pi(filter_1) = [1]
      pi(filter2_0) = []
      pi(filter2_1) = [1]
      pi(filter2_2) = [2]
      pi(filter2_3) = [3]
      pi(._2) = []
      pi(i_1) = []
      pi(|1|_0) = []
      pi(filter_2) = []
      pi(nil_0) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
p2: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
p2: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r3, r4, r5, r7, r8, r9, r12, r16, r17, r20, r24

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order:
      
        carrier: N^1
        order: standard order
        interpretations:
          filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
          cons_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
          filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = x4 + 3
          app_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 5
          false_0_A() = 3
          ._0_A() = 1
          ._1_A(x1) = x1 + 3
          cons_0_A() = 1
          cons_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter_0_A() = 1
          filter_1_A(x1) = x1 + 2
          filter2_0_A() = 1
          filter2_1_A(x1) = x1 + 3
          filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 7
          filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2 + x3 + 6
          map_0_A() = 2
          map_1_A(x1) = x1 + 1
          ._2_A(x1,x2) = 2
          i_1_A(x1) = 2
          |1|_0_A() = 1
          filter_2_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4
          nil_0_A() = 1
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        cons_2 > ._1 = map_1 = filter_2 > app = false_0 = ._0 = map_0 > filter_2# = cons_1 = filter_1 = filter2_3 = ._2 = i_1 > filter2_4# = cons_0 = filter_0 = filter2_2 = |1|_0 = nil_0 > filter2_1 > filter2_0
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(filter_2#) = []
      pi(cons_2) = [2]
      pi(filter2_4#) = [4]
      pi(app) = []
      pi(false_0) = []
      pi(._0) = []
      pi(._1) = [1]
      pi(cons_0) = []
      pi(cons_1) = [1]
      pi(filter_0) = []
      pi(filter_1) = [1]
      pi(filter2_0) = []
      pi(filter2_1) = [1]
      pi(filter2_2) = [1, 2]
      pi(filter2_3) = [3]
      pi(map_0) = []
      pi(map_1) = [1]
      pi(._2) = []
      pi(i_1) = []
      pi(|1|_0) = []
      pi(filter_2) = []
      pi(nil_0) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p2



-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(._0(),y) -> ._1(y)
r2: app(._1(x1),y) -> ._2(x1,y)
r3: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y)
r4: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y)
r5: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y)
r6: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y)
r7: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y)
r8: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y)
r9: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y)
r10: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y)
r11: app(i_0(),y) -> i_1(y)
r12: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y)
r13: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y)
r14: ._2(|1|_0(),x) -> x
r15: ._2(x,|1|_0()) -> x
r16: ._2(i_1(x),x) -> |1|_0()
r17: ._2(x,i_1(x)) -> |1|_0()
r18: ._2(i_1(y),._2(y,z)) -> z
r19: ._2(y,._2(i_1(y),z)) -> z
r20: i_1(|1|_0()) -> |1|_0()
r21: i_1(i_1(x)) -> x
r22: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r23: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs))
r24: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0()
r25: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs)
r26: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs))
r27: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  (no SCCs)