YES We show the termination of the TRS R: g(A()) -> A() g(B()) -> A() g(B()) -> B() g(C()) -> A() g(C()) -> B() g(C()) -> C() foldB(t,|0|()) -> t foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) foldC(t,|0|()) -> t foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldB(t,n),B()) p2: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> foldB#(t,n) p3: foldC#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldC(t,n),C()) p4: foldC#(t,s(n)) -> foldC#(t,n) p5: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p6: f#(t,x) -> g#(x) p7: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) p8: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|#(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) p9: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> foldB#(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b) p10: |f''|#(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC#(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) p11: fold#(t,x,s(n)) -> f#(fold(t,x,n),x) p12: fold#(t,x,s(n)) -> fold#(t,x,n) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p12} {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p7, p8, p9, p10} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: fold#(t,x,s(n)) -> fold#(t,x,n) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r12 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order: carrier: N^1 order: standard order interpretations: fold#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x3 s_A(x1) = x1 + 6 g_A(x1) = 5 A_A() = 2 B_A() = 3 C_A() = 4 |f'|_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 22 triple_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2 + x3 + 7 base order 2: precedence: |f'| > triple > s = g > fold# = C > B > A partial status: pi(fold#) = [1] pi(s) = [1] pi(g) = [] pi(A) = [] pi(B) = [] pi(C) = [] pi(|f'|) = [1] pi(triple) = [3] The following rules are removed: p1 Then no dependency pair remains. -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldB(t,n),B()) p2: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p3: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> foldB#(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b) p4: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> foldB#(t,n) p5: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|#(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) p6: |f''|#(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC#(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) p7: foldC#(t,s(n)) -> foldC#(t,n) p8: foldC#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldC(t,n),C()) p9: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order: carrier: N^1 order: standard order interpretations: foldB#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 5 s_A(x1) = x1 + 14 f#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 7 foldB_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1 B_A() = 5 |f'|#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 5 g_A(x1) = x1 + 1 triple_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 15 A_A() = 2 |0|_A() = 1 |f''|#_A(x1) = x1 + 4 foldC#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2 foldC_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1 C_A() = 7 f_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 14 |f'|_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 14 |f''|_A(x1) = x1 + 3 base order 2: precedence: foldB# > foldB = foldC# > s = g > C > foldC > |f''| > f = |f'| > f# = |f'|# = triple > B = |f''|# > A > |0| partial status: pi(foldB#) = [] pi(s) = [] pi(f#) = [] pi(foldB) = [] pi(B) = [] pi(|f'|#) = [1, 2] pi(g) = [] pi(triple) = [3] pi(A) = [] pi(|0|) = [] pi(|f''|#) = [1] pi(foldC#) = [2] pi(foldC) = [2] pi(C) = [] pi(f) = [1] pi(|f'|) = [1] pi(|f''|) = [1] The following rules are removed: p7 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldB(t,n),B()) p2: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p3: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> foldB#(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b) p4: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> foldB#(t,n) p5: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|#(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) p6: |f''|#(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC#(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) p7: foldC#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldC(t,n),C()) p8: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldB(t,n),B()) p2: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p3: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) p4: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|#(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) p5: |f''|#(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC#(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) p6: foldC#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldC(t,n),C()) p7: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> foldB#(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b) p8: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> foldB#(t,n) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order: carrier: N^1 order: standard order interpretations: foldB#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 s_A(x1) = x1 + 30 f#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2 foldB_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2 B_A() = 25 |f'|#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 g_A(x1) = x1 + 1 triple_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 10 A_A() = 12 |f''|#_A(x1) = x1 + 8 |0|_A() = 1 foldC#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 6 foldC_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2 C_A() = 31 f_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 30 |f'|_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 30 |f''|_A(x1) = x1 + 27 base order 2: precedence: foldC > C > foldB# = s = foldB = |f'|# > f# > B > f = |f'| > |f''| > triple = foldC# > A > g = |f''|# > |0| partial status: pi(foldB#) = [2] pi(s) = [1] pi(f#) = [] pi(foldB) = [] pi(B) = [] pi(|f'|#) = [1, 2] pi(g) = [] pi(triple) = [2] pi(A) = [] pi(|f''|#) = [] pi(|0|) = [] pi(foldC#) = [] pi(foldC) = [2] pi(C) = [] pi(f) = [] pi(|f'|) = [] pi(|f''|) = [1] The following rules are removed: p8 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldB(t,n),B()) p2: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p3: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) p4: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|#(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) p5: |f''|#(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC#(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) p6: foldC#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldC(t,n),C()) p7: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> foldB#(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldB(t,n),B()) p2: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p3: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> foldB#(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b) p4: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|#(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) p5: |f''|#(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC#(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) p6: foldC#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldC(t,n),C()) p7: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15, r16 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order: carrier: N^1 order: standard order interpretations: foldB#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 12 s_A(x1) = x1 + 28 f#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2 foldB_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 5 B_A() = 32 |f'|#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 g_A(x1) = x1 + 1 triple_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 12 A_A() = 17 |0|_A() = 1 |f''|#_A(x1) = x1 + 10 foldC#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 8 foldC_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 C_A() = 33 f_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 28 |f'|_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 28 |f''|_A(x1) = x1 + 2 fold_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + 29 base order 2: precedence: foldB = foldC = fold > |0| = f = |f'| > triple > |f'|# > foldB# = |f''|# > f# > B = foldC# > g > C > s > A > |f''| partial status: pi(foldB#) = [] pi(s) = [] pi(f#) = [1] pi(foldB) = [] pi(B) = [] pi(|f'|#) = [1] pi(g) = [] pi(triple) = [] pi(A) = [] pi(|0|) = [] pi(|f''|#) = [] pi(foldC#) = [] pi(foldC) = [] pi(C) = [] pi(f) = [] pi(|f'|) = [] pi(|f''|) = [] pi(fold) = [1] The following rules are removed: p5 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldB(t,n),B()) p2: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p3: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> foldB#(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b) p4: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|#(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) p5: foldC#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldC(t,n),C()) p6: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3, p6} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: foldB#(t,s(n)) -> f#(foldB(t,n),B()) p2: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p3: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) p4: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> foldB#(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order: carrier: N^1 order: standard order interpretations: foldB#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2 s_A(x1) = x1 + 9 f#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 4 foldB_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1 B_A() = 5 |f'|#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2 g_A(x1) = x1 + 1 triple_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3 + 10 A_A() = 2 |0|_A() = 1 C_A() = 6 f_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 9 foldC_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1 |f'|_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 9 |f''|_A(x1) = x1 + 3 base order 2: precedence: |f'|# > foldB# = |f''| > foldB = foldC > f# = f = |f'| > triple > s > A > g = |0| > C > B partial status: pi(foldB#) = [2] pi(s) = [1] pi(f#) = [] pi(foldB) = [2] pi(B) = [] pi(|f'|#) = [] pi(g) = [] pi(triple) = [] pi(A) = [] pi(|0|) = [] pi(C) = [] pi(f) = [] pi(foldC) = [2] pi(|f'|) = [] pi(|f''|) = [1] The following rules are removed: p1 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p2: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) p3: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> foldB#(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: f#(t,x) -> |f'|#(t,g(x)) p2: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r12 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: matrix interpretation with standard point-wise order: carrier: N^1 order: standard order interpretations: f#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 5 |f'|#_A(x1,x2) = x2 g_A(x1) = x1 + 4 triple_A(x1,x2,x3) = 4 B_A() = 20 A_A() = 10 C_A() = 21 |f'|_A(x1,x2) = 8 s_A(x1) = x1 + 5 base order 2: precedence: C > B > |f'|# = s > triple = A = |f'| > f# > g partial status: pi(f#) = [] pi(|f'|#) = [] pi(g) = [1] pi(triple) = [] pi(B) = [] pi(A) = [] pi(C) = [] pi(|f'|) = [] pi(s) = [1] The following rules are removed: p1 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: |f'|#(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f#(triple(a,b,c),A()) and R consists of: r1: g(A()) -> A() r2: g(B()) -> A() r3: g(B()) -> B() r4: g(C()) -> A() r5: g(C()) -> B() r6: g(C()) -> C() r7: foldB(t,|0|()) -> t r8: foldB(t,s(n)) -> f(foldB(t,n),B()) r9: foldC(t,|0|()) -> t r10: foldC(t,s(n)) -> f(foldC(t,n),C()) r11: f(t,x) -> |f'|(t,g(x)) r12: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),C()) -> triple(a,b,s(c)) r13: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),B()) -> f(triple(a,b,c),A()) r14: |f'|(triple(a,b,c),A()) -> |f''|(foldB(triple(s(a),|0|(),c),b)) r15: |f''|(triple(a,b,c)) -> foldC(triple(a,b,|0|()),c) r16: fold(t,x,|0|()) -> t r17: fold(t,x,s(n)) -> f(fold(t,x,n),x) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: (no SCCs)