YES
We show the termination of the TRS R:

  f(a(),h(x)) -> f(g(x),h(x))
  h(g(x)) -> h(a())
  g(h(x)) -> g(x)
  h(h(x)) -> x


-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(a(),h(x)) -> f#(g(x),h(x))
p2: f#(a(),h(x)) -> g#(x)
p3: h#(g(x)) -> h#(a())
p4: g#(h(x)) -> g#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: f(a(),h(x)) -> f(g(x),h(x))
r2: h(g(x)) -> h(a())
r3: g(h(x)) -> g(x)
r4: h(h(x)) -> x

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}
  {p4}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(a(),h(x)) -> f#(g(x),h(x))

and R consists of:

r1: f(a(),h(x)) -> f(g(x),h(x))
r2: h(g(x)) -> h(a())
r3: g(h(x)) -> g(x)
r4: h(h(x)) -> x

The set of usable rules consists of

  r2, r3, r4

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        f#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 11, x2 + 7}
        a_A = 5
        h_A(x1) = max{8, x1 + 3}
        g_A(x1) = 0
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        f# > a > h > g
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(f#) = [1, 2]
      pi(a) = []
      pi(h) = []
      pi(g) = []

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(h(x)) -> g#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: f(a(),h(x)) -> f(g(x),h(x))
r2: h(g(x)) -> h(a())
r3: g(h(x)) -> g(x)
r4: h(h(x)) -> x

The set of usable rules consists of

  r4

Take the reduction pair:

  generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG)
  
    base order 1:
  
      max/plus interpretation on natural numbers:
      
        g#_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 2}
        h_A(x1) = max{5, x1 + 1}
  
    base order 2:
  
      precedence:
      
        h > g#
      
  
    partial status:
  
      pi(g#) = []
      pi(h) = [1]

The following rules are removed:

  p1

Then no dependency pair remains.