YES We show the termination of the TRS R: app(app(le(),|0|()),y) -> true() app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),|0|()) -> false() app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(le(),x),y) app(pred(),app(s(),x)) -> x app(app(minus(),x),|0|()) -> x app(app(minus(),x),app(s(),y)) -> app(pred(),app(app(minus(),x),y)) app(app(gcd(),|0|()),y) -> y app(app(gcd(),app(s(),x)),|0|()) -> app(s(),x) app(app(gcd(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(app(if_gcd(),app(app(le(),y),x)),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) app(app(app(if_gcd(),true()),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(gcd(),app(app(minus(),x),y)),app(s(),y)) app(app(app(if_gcd(),false()),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(gcd(),app(app(minus(),y),x)),app(s(),x)) app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil() app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs)) app(app(filter(),f),nil()) -> nil() app(app(filter(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(app(app(filter2(),app(f,x)),f),x),xs) app(app(app(app(filter2(),true()),f),x),xs) -> app(app(cons(),x),app(app(filter(),f),xs)) app(app(app(app(filter2(),false()),f),x),xs) -> app(app(filter(),f),xs) Instead we prove termination of the uncurried system: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: app#(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2#(x1,y) p2: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y) p3: app#(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2#(x1,y) p4: app#(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3#(x1,x2,y) p5: app#(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2#(x1,y) p6: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y) p7: app#(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2#(x1,y) p8: app#(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1#(y) p9: le_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2#(x,y) p10: minus_2#(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1#(minus_2(x,y)) p11: minus_2#(x,s_1(y)) -> minus_2#(x,y) p12: gcd_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3#(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) p13: gcd_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2#(y,x) p14: if_gcd_3#(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2#(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) p15: if_gcd_3#(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2#(x,y) p16: if_gcd_3#(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2#(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) p17: if_gcd_3#(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> minus_2#(y,x) p18: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p19: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs) p20: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p21: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p22: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p23: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p6, p18, p19, p20, p21, p22, p23} {p12, p14, p16} {p9} {p11} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: app#(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2#(x1,y) p2: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p3: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y) p4: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> map_2#(f,xs) p5: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p6: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y) p7: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p8: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p9: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r3, r5, r6, r7, r9, r11, r12, r14, r16, r18, r21, r22, r23, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: app#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 10 filter_1_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 44} filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x2 + 1} cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 10, x2 + 7} map_1_A(x1) = max{19, x1 - 44} map_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{9, x2 + 4} filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{4, x1 - 44, x2 - 44, x3 - 44} filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = max{9, x4 + 6} false_0_A = 1 app_A(x1,x2) = max{19, x1 - 20, x2 - 3} true_0_A = 3 cons_0_A = 6 cons_1_A(x1) = max{7, x1 - 4} filter_0_A = 1 filter2_0_A = 1 filter2_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 3} filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 23, x2 - 3} gcd_0_A = 18 gcd_1_A(x1) = max{19, x1 - 3} if_gcd_0_A = 1 if_gcd_1_A(x1) = max{17, x1 - 4} if_gcd_2_A(x1,x2) = max{18, x1 - 25, x2 - 4} le_0_A = 18 le_1_A(x1) = max{19, x1 - 4} map_0_A = 18 minus_0_A = 19 minus_1_A(x1) = max{17, x1 - 4} s_0_A = 18 s_1_A(x1) = max{19, x1 - 67} le_2_A(x1,x2) = max{17, x1 - 122, x2 - 20} |0|_0_A = 4 filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 84, x2 - 76} nil_0_A = 3 base order 2: precedence: app > map_1 > cons_2 = filter2_3 = filter_0 = map_0 = minus_1 = le_2 = |0|_0 = filter_2 > cons_1 = filter2_2 = le_1 = minus_0 = s_1 = nil_0 > false_0 = true_0 = cons_0 = filter2_1 = gcd_1 = if_gcd_2 = le_0 = s_0 > filter_2# = map_2# = filter2_0 = gcd_0 = if_gcd_1 > app# = filter_1 = if_gcd_0 > filter2_4# partial status: pi(app#) = [2] pi(filter_1) = [] pi(filter_2#) = [2] pi(cons_2) = [2] pi(map_1) = [] pi(map_2#) = [2] pi(filter2_3) = [] pi(filter2_4#) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(app) = [] pi(true_0) = [] pi(cons_0) = [] pi(cons_1) = [] pi(filter_0) = [] pi(filter2_0) = [] pi(filter2_1) = [] pi(filter2_2) = [] pi(gcd_0) = [] pi(gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_0) = [] pi(if_gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_2) = [] pi(le_0) = [] pi(le_1) = [] pi(map_0) = [] pi(minus_0) = [] pi(minus_1) = [] pi(s_0) = [] pi(s_1) = [] pi(le_2) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p4 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: app#(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2#(x1,y) p2: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p3: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y) p4: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p5: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y) p6: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p7: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p8: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: app#(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2#(x1,y) p2: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p3: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p4: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p5: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y) p6: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p7: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y) p8: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r5, r7, r9, r11, r12, r14, r18, r21, r22, r23, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: app#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 38 filter_1_A(x1) = x1 + 40 filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 39 cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{9, x1 - 43, x2 - 43} filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = x2 + 39 app_A(x1,x2) = max{25, x1 - 41, x2} true_0_A = 6 filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{x1 - 27, x2 + 40, x3 - 27} false_0_A = 1 map_1_A(x1) = x1 + 40 map_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 39 cons_0_A = 7 cons_1_A(x1) = max{8, x1 - 1} filter2_0_A = 24 filter2_1_A(x1) = max{25, x1} filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 24, x2 + 82} gcd_0_A = 1 gcd_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 1} if_gcd_0_A = 1 if_gcd_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 1} if_gcd_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 43, x2 - 1} le_0_A = 23 le_1_A(x1) = max{24, x1 - 1} minus_0_A = 22 minus_1_A(x1) = max{23, x1 - 1} s_0_A = 4 s_1_A(x1) = max{5, x1 - 46} le_2_A(x1,x2) = max{25, x1 - 43, x2 - 8} |0|_0_A = 7 filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{24, x1 - 68, x2 - 21} nil_0_A = 0 base order 2: precedence: filter_2 > app > filter_1 = filter2_3 = map_1 > cons_2 = cons_1 = filter2_2 = le_2 = |0|_0 = nil_0 > true_0 = cons_0 = filter2_1 = le_1 > filter2_0 = le_0 > minus_1 > map_2# = gcd_1 = minus_0 = s_1 > app# = false_0 = gcd_0 = if_gcd_2 = s_0 > filter_2# = filter2_4# = if_gcd_1 > if_gcd_0 partial status: pi(app#) = [1] pi(filter_1) = [] pi(filter_2#) = [] pi(cons_2) = [] pi(filter2_4#) = [] pi(app) = [2] pi(true_0) = [] pi(filter2_3) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(map_1) = [1] pi(map_2#) = [1] pi(cons_0) = [] pi(cons_1) = [] pi(filter2_0) = [] pi(filter2_1) = [] pi(filter2_2) = [] pi(gcd_0) = [] pi(gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_0) = [] pi(if_gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_2) = [] pi(le_0) = [] pi(le_1) = [] pi(minus_0) = [] pi(minus_1) = [] pi(s_0) = [] pi(s_1) = [] pi(le_2) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p1 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p2: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p3: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p4: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y) p5: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p6: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y) p7: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p2: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p3: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p4: app#(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2#(x1,y) p5: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p6: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y) p7: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r5, r6, r9, r11, r12, r14, r18, r21, r22, r23, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 4 cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{0, x1 - 31, x2 - 31} filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = x2 + 4 app_A(x1,x2) = max{20, x1 - 9, x2 - 9} false_0_A = 3 app#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1} map_1_A(x1) = x1 + 3 map_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 + 2} filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{8, x1 + 3, x2 + 5, x3 + 3} true_0_A = 1 cons_0_A = 7 cons_1_A(x1) = max{8, x1 - 9} filter_0_A = 7 filter_1_A(x1) = max{8, x1 - 10} filter2_0_A = 1 filter2_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 10} filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 19, x2 - 9} gcd_0_A = 8 gcd_1_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 10} if_gcd_0_A = 3 if_gcd_1_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 10} if_gcd_2_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 20, x2 - 10} le_0_A = 2 le_1_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 10} minus_0_A = 7 minus_1_A(x1) = max{8, x1 - 10} s_0_A = 6 s_1_A(x1) = max{7, x1 - 28} le_2_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 39, x2 - 49} |0|_0_A = 4 filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{12, x1 - 31, x2 - 20} nil_0_A = 0 base order 2: precedence: filter_2 > app = filter_0 > filter2_3 = filter_1 > map_1 = nil_0 > filter2_1 = filter2_2 = gcd_0 = if_gcd_2 = minus_1 = s_1 = le_2 > filter2_0 = gcd_1 = if_gcd_1 = le_1 = minus_0 = s_0 = |0|_0 > false_0 = if_gcd_0 = le_0 > filter_2# = filter2_4# > app# > cons_2 = map_2# > true_0 = cons_1 > cons_0 partial status: pi(filter_2#) = [] pi(cons_2) = [] pi(filter2_4#) = [] pi(app) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(app#) = [1] pi(map_1) = [] pi(map_2#) = [] pi(filter2_3) = [] pi(true_0) = [] pi(cons_0) = [] pi(cons_1) = [] pi(filter_0) = [] pi(filter_1) = [] pi(filter2_0) = [] pi(filter2_1) = [] pi(filter2_2) = [] pi(gcd_0) = [] pi(gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_0) = [] pi(if_gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_2) = [] pi(le_0) = [] pi(le_1) = [] pi(minus_0) = [] pi(minus_1) = [] pi(s_0) = [] pi(s_1) = [] pi(le_2) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p4 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p2: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p3: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p4: map_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p5: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y) p6: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p3, p5, p6} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p2: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p3: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> app#(f,x) p4: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y) p5: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r22, r23, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 7 cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 30, x2 - 30} filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = x2 + 7 app_A(x1,x2) = max{24, x1 - 27} true_0_A = 2 app#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + 6 filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{23, x1 - 1, x2 + 7, x3 - 1} false_0_A = 8 le_2_A(x1,x2) = max{22, x1 - 36, x2 - 28} |0|_0_A = 9 s_1_A(x1) = x1 + 21 filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{23, x1 - 38, x2 - 9} nil_0_A = 0 base order 2: precedence: le_2 > s_1 = filter_2 = nil_0 > app = |0|_0 > app# = filter2_3 = false_0 > filter_2# = filter2_4# > cons_2 > true_0 partial status: pi(filter_2#) = [1] pi(cons_2) = [] pi(filter2_4#) = [2] pi(app) = [] pi(true_0) = [] pi(app#) = [1] pi(filter2_3) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(le_2) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(s_1) = [1] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p3 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p2: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p3: app#(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4#(x1,x2,x3,y) p4: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2, p4} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p2: filter2_4#(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) p3: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r5, r6, r7, r9, r11, r12, r14, r18, r21, r22, r23, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 40 cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{61, x1 + 38, x2 + 42} filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = max{x3 + 37, x4 + 41} app_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 9, x2 + 69} false_0_A = 5 true_0_A = 31 cons_0_A = 7 cons_1_A(x1) = x1 + 69 filter_0_A = 1 filter_1_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 33} filter2_0_A = 1 filter2_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 1} filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 11, x2 - 1} filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{4, x1 - 20, x2 - 10, x3 - 1} gcd_0_A = 14 gcd_1_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 62} if_gcd_0_A = 5 if_gcd_1_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 1} if_gcd_2_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 11, x2 - 306} le_0_A = 1 le_1_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 61} minus_0_A = 7 minus_1_A(x1) = max{8, x1 - 312} s_0_A = 1 s_1_A(x1) = max{69, x1 - 141} le_2_A(x1,x2) = max{69, x1 - 70, x2 - 70} |0|_0_A = 6 filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{32, x1 - 43, x2 - 62} nil_0_A = 0 base order 2: precedence: filter_2 = nil_0 > app > filter_1 = filter2_3 > cons_2 = filter_0 = filter2_1 = filter2_2 = minus_1 = le_2 > cons_1 = filter2_0 = le_1 = minus_0 = s_1 > true_0 = cons_0 = gcd_1 = if_gcd_2 = le_0 = s_0 > gcd_0 = if_gcd_1 = |0|_0 > false_0 = if_gcd_0 > filter_2# = filter2_4# partial status: pi(filter_2#) = [2] pi(cons_2) = [2] pi(filter2_4#) = [] pi(app) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(true_0) = [] pi(cons_0) = [] pi(cons_1) = [] pi(filter_0) = [] pi(filter_1) = [] pi(filter2_0) = [] pi(filter2_1) = [] pi(filter2_2) = [] pi(filter2_3) = [] pi(gcd_0) = [] pi(gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_0) = [] pi(if_gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_2) = [] pi(le_0) = [] pi(le_1) = [] pi(minus_0) = [] pi(minus_1) = [] pi(s_0) = [] pi(s_1) = [] pi(le_2) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p2 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p2: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) p2: filter2_4#(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2#(f,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r16, r22, r23, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: filter_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{8, x2 + 1} cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 16, x2 + 18} filter2_4#_A(x1,x2,x3,x4) = max{15, x3 + 9, x4 + 9} app_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 + 4} true_0_A = 5 map_0_A = 1 map_1_A(x1) = 6 le_2_A(x1,x2) = max{16, x1 - 15, x2 - 52} |0|_0_A = 6 s_1_A(x1) = max{14, x1 - 52} false_0_A = 3 filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{7, x1 - 19, x2 - 17} nil_0_A = 2 base order 2: precedence: cons_2 > filter_2 = nil_0 > filter2_4# = app = map_0 > filter_2# = map_1 > le_2 > s_1 > |0|_0 > true_0 = false_0 partial status: pi(filter_2#) = [2] pi(cons_2) = [1, 2] pi(filter2_4#) = [] pi(app) = [1] pi(true_0) = [] pi(map_0) = [] pi(map_1) = [] pi(le_2) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(s_1) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p2 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: filter_2#(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4#(app(f,x),f,x,xs) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: (no SCCs) -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: gcd_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3#(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) p2: if_gcd_3#(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2#(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) p3: if_gcd_3#(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2#(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r2, r3, r7, r9, r11, r12, r14, r16, r18, r20, r22, r23, r24, r25, r26, r27, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: gcd_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{68, x1 + 54, x2 + 37} s_1_A(x1) = max{29, x1 + 23} if_gcd_3#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{68, x1 - 2, x2 + 38, x3 + 37} le_2_A(x1,x2) = max{82, x1 - 73, x2 - 73} false_0_A = 71 minus_2_A(x1,x2) = max{14, x1 + 3, x2 - 30} true_0_A = 1 app_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 8, x2 - 21} cons_1_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 1} cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 10, x2 - 73} filter_0_A = 3 filter_1_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 22} filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = max{17, x1 - 29, x2 - 21} filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{9, x1 - 80, x2 - 29, x3 - 22} gcd_0_A = 1 gcd_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 88} if_gcd_0_A = 7 if_gcd_1_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 138} if_gcd_2_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 146, x2 - 21} le_0_A = 18 le_1_A(x1) = max{9, x1 - 74} map_0_A = 1 map_1_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 22} minus_0_A = 3 minus_1_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 22} pred_0_A = 3 pred_1_A(x1) = max{4, x1 - 22} |0|_0_A = 72 filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{72, x1 - 1, x2 - 5} nil_0_A = 0 base order 2: precedence: minus_2 > pred_1 > gcd_2# = s_1 = if_gcd_3# = filter_0 = map_0 = pred_0 = filter_2 > app = nil_0 > le_2 = cons_1 = cons_2 = filter_1 = filter2_3 = gcd_1 = if_gcd_2 = map_1 = minus_1 = |0|_0 > false_0 = true_0 = filter2_2 = gcd_0 = if_gcd_1 = le_1 = minus_0 > if_gcd_0 = le_0 partial status: pi(gcd_2#) = [2] pi(s_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_3#) = [3] pi(le_2) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(minus_2) = [1] pi(true_0) = [] pi(app) = [] pi(cons_1) = [] pi(cons_2) = [] pi(filter_0) = [] pi(filter_1) = [] pi(filter2_2) = [] pi(filter2_3) = [] pi(gcd_0) = [] pi(gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_0) = [] pi(if_gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_2) = [] pi(le_0) = [] pi(le_1) = [] pi(map_0) = [] pi(map_1) = [] pi(minus_0) = [] pi(minus_1) = [] pi(pred_0) = [] pi(pred_1) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p2 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: gcd_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3#(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) p2: if_gcd_3#(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2#(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1, p2} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: gcd_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3#(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) p2: if_gcd_3#(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2#(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r5, r6, r7, r9, r11, r12, r14, r16, r18, r19, r20, r21, r22, r23, r24, r25, r26, r27, r28, r29, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: gcd_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{21, x1 + 16} s_1_A(x1) = x1 + 40 if_gcd_3#_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{41, x1 - 1, x2 + 2} le_2_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 57 true_0_A = 23 minus_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1} app_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 23, x2 + 160} cons_0_A = 138 cons_1_A(x1) = max{161, x1 + 24} cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{52, x1 + 25, x2 - 27} filter_0_A = 1 filter_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 113} filter2_0_A = 139 filter2_1_A(x1) = max{161, x1 - 155} filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = max{184, x1 - 132, x2 - 134} filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{28, x1 - 133, x2 - 133, x3 - 24} gcd_0_A = 162 gcd_1_A(x1) = max{161, x1 - 23} if_gcd_0_A = 1 if_gcd_1_A(x1) = max{54, x1 - 21} if_gcd_2_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 22, x2 + 159} le_0_A = 1 le_1_A(x1) = max{54, x1 - 24} map_0_A = 5 map_1_A(x1) = max{27, x1} minus_0_A = 1 minus_1_A(x1) = max{0, x1 - 22} pred_0_A = 1 pred_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 2} s_0_A = 1 |0|_0_A = 24 false_0_A = 21 gcd_2_A(x1,x2) = max{x1, x2 + 160} filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{26, x1 - 112, x2 - 53} nil_0_A = 24 base order 2: precedence: minus_2 = if_gcd_2 > app = pred_1 > cons_1 = cons_2 = filter2_3 = if_gcd_0 = gcd_2 > s_1 = cons_0 = filter2_2 = gcd_1 = if_gcd_1 = map_1 = minus_1 = pred_0 = filter_2 = nil_0 > filter_1 = filter2_1 = gcd_0 = map_0 = minus_0 = s_0 = |0|_0 > true_0 = filter_0 = filter2_0 > le_2 > gcd_2# = le_1 = false_0 > if_gcd_3# = le_0 partial status: pi(gcd_2#) = [] pi(s_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_3#) = [2] pi(le_2) = [] pi(true_0) = [] pi(minus_2) = [1] pi(app) = [] pi(cons_0) = [] pi(cons_1) = [] pi(cons_2) = [] pi(filter_0) = [] pi(filter_1) = [] pi(filter2_0) = [] pi(filter2_1) = [] pi(filter2_2) = [] pi(filter2_3) = [] pi(gcd_0) = [] pi(gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_0) = [] pi(if_gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_2) = [] pi(le_0) = [] pi(le_1) = [] pi(map_0) = [] pi(map_1) = [] pi(minus_0) = [] pi(minus_1) = [] pi(pred_0) = [] pi(pred_1) = [] pi(s_0) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(gcd_2) = [2] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p2 -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: gcd_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3#(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: (no SCCs) -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: le_2#(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r5, r6, r7, r9, r11, r12, r14, r16, r18, r22, r23, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: le_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{1, x1 - 23, x2 - 26} s_1_A(x1) = max{25, x1 + 22} app_A(x1,x2) = max{24, x1 - 13, x2 - 4} cons_0_A = 1 cons_1_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 38} cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{2, x1 - 51, x2 - 24} filter_0_A = 1 filter_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 46} filter2_0_A = 1 filter2_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 4} filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 18, x2 - 5} filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{4, x1 - 32, x2 - 18, x3 - 4} gcd_0_A = 11 gcd_1_A(x1) = max{12, x1 - 35} if_gcd_0_A = 12 if_gcd_1_A(x1) = max{10, x1 - 5} if_gcd_2_A(x1,x2) = max{11, x1 - 19, x2 - 41} le_0_A = 8 le_1_A(x1) = max{9, x1 - 5} map_0_A = 11 map_1_A(x1) = max{12, x1 - 51} minus_0_A = 11 minus_1_A(x1) = max{12, x1 - 5} le_2_A(x1,x2) = max{10, x2 - 28} |0|_0_A = 24 true_0_A = 1 false_0_A = 1 filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 60, x2 - 25} nil_0_A = 2 base order 2: precedence: le_2# = le_2 > s_1 = filter2_0 = minus_1 = filter_2 > app = minus_0 = |0|_0 > filter_1 = filter2_3 = gcd_1 = if_gcd_2 = le_1 = false_0 > cons_2 = filter_0 = filter2_2 = gcd_0 = if_gcd_1 = le_0 = map_1 = nil_0 > cons_1 = filter2_1 = if_gcd_0 = map_0 = true_0 > cons_0 partial status: pi(le_2#) = [] pi(s_1) = [1] pi(app) = [] pi(cons_0) = [] pi(cons_1) = [] pi(cons_2) = [] pi(filter_0) = [] pi(filter_1) = [] pi(filter2_0) = [] pi(filter2_1) = [] pi(filter2_2) = [] pi(filter2_3) = [] pi(gcd_0) = [] pi(gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_0) = [] pi(if_gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_2) = [] pi(le_0) = [] pi(le_1) = [] pi(map_0) = [] pi(map_1) = [] pi(minus_0) = [] pi(minus_1) = [] pi(le_2) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(true_0) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p1 Then no dependency pair remains. -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: minus_2#(x,s_1(y)) -> minus_2#(x,y) and R consists of: r1: app(cons_0(),y) -> cons_1(y) r2: app(cons_1(x1),y) -> cons_2(x1,y) r3: app(filter_0(),y) -> filter_1(y) r4: app(filter_1(x1),y) -> filter_2(x1,y) r5: app(filter2_0(),y) -> filter2_1(y) r6: app(filter2_1(x1),y) -> filter2_2(x1,y) r7: app(filter2_2(x1,x2),y) -> filter2_3(x1,x2,y) r8: app(filter2_3(x1,x2,x3),y) -> filter2_4(x1,x2,x3,y) r9: app(gcd_0(),y) -> gcd_1(y) r10: app(gcd_1(x1),y) -> gcd_2(x1,y) r11: app(if_gcd_0(),y) -> if_gcd_1(y) r12: app(if_gcd_1(x1),y) -> if_gcd_2(x1,y) r13: app(if_gcd_2(x1,x2),y) -> if_gcd_3(x1,x2,y) r14: app(le_0(),y) -> le_1(y) r15: app(le_1(x1),y) -> le_2(x1,y) r16: app(map_0(),y) -> map_1(y) r17: app(map_1(x1),y) -> map_2(x1,y) r18: app(minus_0(),y) -> minus_1(y) r19: app(minus_1(x1),y) -> minus_2(x1,y) r20: app(pred_0(),y) -> pred_1(y) r21: app(s_0(),y) -> s_1(y) r22: le_2(|0|_0(),y) -> true_0() r23: le_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> false_0() r24: le_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> le_2(x,y) r25: pred_1(s_1(x)) -> x r26: minus_2(x,|0|_0()) -> x r27: minus_2(x,s_1(y)) -> pred_1(minus_2(x,y)) r28: gcd_2(|0|_0(),y) -> y r29: gcd_2(s_1(x),|0|_0()) -> s_1(x) r30: gcd_2(s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> if_gcd_3(le_2(y,x),s_1(x),s_1(y)) r31: if_gcd_3(true_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(x,y),s_1(y)) r32: if_gcd_3(false_0(),s_1(x),s_1(y)) -> gcd_2(minus_2(y,x),s_1(x)) r33: map_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r34: map_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> cons_2(app(f,x),map_2(f,xs)) r35: filter_2(f,nil_0()) -> nil_0() r36: filter_2(f,cons_2(x,xs)) -> filter2_4(app(f,x),f,x,xs) r37: filter2_4(true_0(),f,x,xs) -> cons_2(x,filter_2(f,xs)) r38: filter2_4(false_0(),f,x,xs) -> filter_2(f,xs) The set of usable rules consists of r1, r2, r3, r5, r6, r7, r9, r11, r12, r14, r16, r18, r22, r23, r35 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: minus_2#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 + 11, x2 + 9} s_1_A(x1) = max{22, x1 + 9} app_A(x1,x2) = max{25, x1 - 4, x2 - 7} cons_0_A = 2 cons_1_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 22} cons_2_A(x1,x2) = max{4, x1 - 26, x2 - 7} filter_0_A = 1 filter_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 8} filter2_0_A = 1 filter2_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 8} filter2_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 12, x2 - 7} filter2_3_A(x1,x2,x3) = max{5, x1 - 34, x2 - 12, x3 - 8} gcd_0_A = 1 gcd_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 8} if_gcd_0_A = 1 if_gcd_1_A(x1) = max{2, x1 - 7} if_gcd_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 20, x2 - 52} le_0_A = 2 le_1_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 32} map_0_A = 2 map_1_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 8} minus_0_A = 1 minus_1_A(x1) = max{3, x1 - 8} le_2_A(x1,x2) = max{23, x1 - 36, x2 - 23} |0|_0_A = 2 true_0_A = 1 false_0_A = 1 filter_2_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 38, x2 - 13} nil_0_A = 0 base order 2: precedence: minus_2# = filter_2 > s_1 = app = le_2 > gcd_1 = if_gcd_2 = minus_0 = |0|_0 > cons_0 = cons_2 = filter_1 = filter2_3 = gcd_0 = if_gcd_1 = le_1 = map_1 = minus_1 = false_0 = nil_0 > cons_1 = filter_0 = filter2_2 = if_gcd_0 = le_0 = map_0 = true_0 > filter2_1 > filter2_0 partial status: pi(minus_2#) = [2] pi(s_1) = [] pi(app) = [] pi(cons_0) = [] pi(cons_1) = [] pi(cons_2) = [] pi(filter_0) = [] pi(filter_1) = [] pi(filter2_0) = [] pi(filter2_1) = [] pi(filter2_2) = [] pi(filter2_3) = [] pi(gcd_0) = [] pi(gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_0) = [] pi(if_gcd_1) = [] pi(if_gcd_2) = [] pi(le_0) = [] pi(le_1) = [] pi(map_0) = [] pi(map_1) = [] pi(minus_0) = [] pi(minus_1) = [] pi(le_2) = [] pi(|0|_0) = [] pi(true_0) = [] pi(false_0) = [] pi(filter_2) = [] pi(nil_0) = [] The following rules are removed: p1 Then no dependency pair remains.