YES We show the termination of the TRS R: cond(true(),x) -> cond(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) and(x,false()) -> false() and(false(),x) -> false() and(true(),true()) -> true() even(|0|()) -> true() even(s(|0|())) -> false() even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) gr(|0|(),x) -> false() gr(s(x),|0|()) -> true() gr(s(x),s(y())) -> gr(x,y()) p(|0|()) -> |0|() p(s(x)) -> x -- SCC decomposition. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: cond#(true(),x) -> cond#(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) p2: cond#(true(),x) -> and#(even(x),gr(x,|0|())) p3: cond#(true(),x) -> even#(x) p4: cond#(true(),x) -> gr#(x,|0|()) p5: cond#(true(),x) -> p#(x) p6: even#(s(s(x))) -> even#(x) p7: gr#(s(x),s(y())) -> gr#(x,y()) and R consists of: r1: cond(true(),x) -> cond(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) r2: and(x,false()) -> false() r3: and(false(),x) -> false() r4: and(true(),true()) -> true() r5: even(|0|()) -> true() r6: even(s(|0|())) -> false() r7: even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) r8: gr(|0|(),x) -> false() r9: gr(s(x),|0|()) -> true() r10: gr(s(x),s(y())) -> gr(x,y()) r11: p(|0|()) -> |0|() r12: p(s(x)) -> x The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs: {p1} {p6} -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: cond#(true(),x) -> cond#(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) and R consists of: r1: cond(true(),x) -> cond(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) r2: and(x,false()) -> false() r3: and(false(),x) -> false() r4: and(true(),true()) -> true() r5: even(|0|()) -> true() r6: even(s(|0|())) -> false() r7: even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) r8: gr(|0|(),x) -> false() r9: gr(s(x),|0|()) -> true() r10: gr(s(x),s(y())) -> gr(x,y()) r11: p(|0|()) -> |0|() r12: p(s(x)) -> x The set of usable rules consists of r2, r3, r4, r6, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: cond#_A(x1,x2) = max{x1 - 2, x2 + 16} true_A = 25 and_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 11 even_A(x1) = 24 gr_A(x1,x2) = max{3, x1 - 12} |0|_A = 5 p_A(x1) = max{6, x1 - 17} false_A = 2 s_A(x1) = x1 + 38 y_A = 4 base order 2: precedence: cond# > p > and = |0| > false > gr > true > s > even = y partial status: pi(cond#) = [] pi(true) = [] pi(and) = [2] pi(even) = [] pi(gr) = [] pi(|0|) = [] pi(p) = [] pi(false) = [] pi(s) = [1] pi(y) = [] The following rules are removed: p1 Then no dependency pair remains. -- Reduction pair. Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of p1: even#(s(s(x))) -> even#(x) and R consists of: r1: cond(true(),x) -> cond(and(even(x),gr(x,|0|())),p(x)) r2: and(x,false()) -> false() r3: and(false(),x) -> false() r4: and(true(),true()) -> true() r5: even(|0|()) -> true() r6: even(s(|0|())) -> false() r7: even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) r8: gr(|0|(),x) -> false() r9: gr(s(x),|0|()) -> true() r10: gr(s(x),s(y())) -> gr(x,y()) r11: p(|0|()) -> |0|() r12: p(s(x)) -> x The set of usable rules consists of r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r8, r10, r12 Take the reduction pair: generalized weighted path order (>=MG, >MG) base order 1: max/plus interpretation on natural numbers: even#_A(x1) = max{1, x1 - 1} s_A(x1) = x1 + 12 and_A(x1,x2) = max{5, x1 - 6, x2 - 6} false_A = 2 true_A = 4 even_A(x1) = max{5, x1 - 25} |0|_A = 5 gr_A(x1,x2) = max{11, x1 - 18} y_A = 10 p_A(x1) = max{12, x1 - 11} base order 2: precedence: gr = p > even# = s > and = even = |0| > false = true = y partial status: pi(even#) = [] pi(s) = [1] pi(and) = [] pi(false) = [] pi(true) = [] pi(even) = [] pi(|0|) = [] pi(gr) = [] pi(y) = [] pi(p) = [] The following rules are removed: p1 Then no dependency pair remains.