NO (ignored inputs)COMMENT [111] Example 1 Rewrite Rules: [ a -> b, f(?x,a) -> f(b,b), f(b,?x) -> f(b,b), f(f(?x,?y),?z) -> f(b,b) ] Apply Direct Methods... Inner CPs: [ f(?x,b) = f(b,b), f(f(b,b),?z_2) = f(b,b), f(f(b,b),?z_2) = f(b,b), f(f(b,b),?z_1) = f(b,b) ] Outer CPs: [ f(b,b) = f(b,b), f(b,b) = f(b,b) ] not Overlay, check Termination... unknown/not Terminating unknown Knuth & Bendix Linear unknown Development Closed unknown Strongly Closed unknown Weakly-Non-Overlapping & Non-Collapsing & Shallow inner CP cond (upside-parallel) innter CP Cond (outside) unknown Upside-Parallel-Closed/Outside-Closed (inner) Parallel CPs: (not computed) unknown Toyama (Parallel CPs) Simultaneous CPs: [ f(b,b) = f(?x,b), f(b,b) = f(b,b), f(?x,b) = f(b,b), f(b,b) = f(f(b,b),?z_3), f(f(b,b),?z) = f(b,b) ] unknown Okui (Simultaneous CPs) unknown Strongly Depth-Preserving & Root-E-Closed/Non-E-Overlapping unknown Strongly Weight-Preserving & Root-E-Closed/Non-E-Overlapping check Locally Decreasing Diagrams by Rule Labelling... Critical Pair by Rules <0, 1> preceded by [(f,2)] unknown Diagram Decreasing check Non-Confluence... obtain 5 rules by 3 steps unfolding obtain 3 candidates for checking non-joinability check by TCAP-Approximation (failure) check by Ordering(rpo), check by Tree-Automata Approximation (success) Witness for Non-Confluence: f(c_1,b)> Direct Methods: not CR Combined result: not CR 512.trs: Success(not CR) (15 msec.)