NO (ignored inputs)COMMENT from the collection of \cite{Aoto2013} Rewrite Rules: [ a -> f(a), a -> g(h(a)), f(?x) -> h(g(?x)), h(?x) -> f(g(?x)) ] Apply Direct Methods... Inner CPs: [ ] Outer CPs: [ f(a) = g(h(a)) ] Overlay, check Innermost Termination... unknown Innermost Terminating unknown Knuth & Bendix Linear unknown Development Closed unknown Strongly Closed unknown Weakly-Non-Overlapping & Non-Collapsing & Shallow unknown Upside-Parallel-Closed/Outside-Closed (inner) Parallel CPs: (not computed) unknown Toyama (Parallel CPs) Simultaneous CPs: [ g(h(a)) = f(a), f(a) = g(h(a)) ] unknown Okui (Simultaneous CPs) unknown Strongly Depth-Preserving & Root-E-Closed/Non-E-Overlapping unknown Strongly Weight-Preserving & Root-E-Closed/Non-E-Overlapping check Locally Decreasing Diagrams by Rule Labelling... Critical Pair by Rules <1, 0> preceded by [] unknown Diagram Decreasing check Non-Confluence... obtain 14 rules by 3 steps unfolding strenghten f(f(a)) and f(a) strenghten g(h(a)) and f(a) strenghten h(g(a)) and f(a) obtain 100 candidates for checking non-joinability check by TCAP-Approximation (failure) check by Root-Approximation (success) Witness for Non-Confluence: Direct Methods: not CR Final result: not CR 246.trs: Success(not CR) (102 msec.)